Pat Robertson’s endorsement of Rudy means that Pat Robertson is willing to sacrifice his principles for politics.
And/Or Pat Robertson is a closet Liberal. Then if that was the case, then Pat is hiding is true agenda, which is hypocritical and unchristian.
I was a George HW Bush alternate delegate in 1988 in New Orleans from NY State. Robertson decided to endorse Bush at the Convention and the night that he spoke his people put a placard on the chair of every delegate. It read as follows:
ROBERTSON
(in HUGE letters)
for Bush
(in TINY letters)
Or maybe he's a closet queer like Ted Haggard. You have to assume from this endorsement that Robertson is pro-gay rights and at least neutral on abortion.
No it says what the article says, that Robertson is pragmatic.
Remember, our icon, the man that our devotion to is called by Bill Maher to be gay in nature (that line made me want to barf when I heard that), Ronald Reagan signed into law the most liberal abortion law in the nation as Governor of California...
That being said, Pat Robertson is cozying up to the wrong guy... The only thing Rudy has going for him is the number of electoral votes he can put into play that otherwise might be safe for the Democrats, which is enough to put him second on my list of preferable candidates. Fred Thompson can lock up the south, most of the west, put more midwestern states in our column than any other candidate, and maybe pick up some northeastern states—with his Hollywood connections, he may even pick up California.. The Democrats have NO strategy to win that doesn’t include winning California and at least three or four southern states (namely Florida, Georgia and Texas)..
The moment Pat endorsed Rudy, I figured he was a closet liberal.