Posted on 11/10/2007 7:57:12 AM PST by slapshot
U.S. Rep. Pete Visclosky finds himself at the center of the national firestorm over "pork" spending, those pet projects members of Congress fund with earmarks to major bills.
The Indiana Democrat has been identified as the sixth-biggest earmarker in the U.S. House, with $116.8 million set aside for special projects in fiscal 2008 budget bills, according to figures compiled by Taxpayers for Common Sense.
In a CNBC interview, one Washington watchdog group accused Visclosky of pioneering "green pork," which are earmarks masquerading as seed money for environmental breakthroughs.
In his first response to numerous reports in national media, Visclosky on Friday vigorously defended his use of earmarks, while acknowledging new disclosure rules have put a spotlight on their use.
"I feel it's my job, every morning I get up, to return to the taxpayers of Northwest Indiana as much of those monies as possible that they have paid in to their federal government," Visclosky said.
The companies mentioned getting money and kicking back are pretty much shell companies.
You’re in the 1st District? Where are you located? I’m on the Lake Co/Porter Co line.
Scam, scam, scam and the people never benefit because the money these fine political creatures(Not)stops at their door and goes into their pockets.
BTW...Visclosky is scum.
He is a scumbag....
I'm sure.
Earmarks are simply legalized bribery. Dennis Hassert's huge expansion of their use when the Pubbies were running things is the main reason I have withdrawn my financial support of the Republican Party.
I’m lurking over in Portage right off County Line Road.
tri town, in the center of the People’s Democratic Republic of Lake County
Lessee we got casino money and earmarks, where does it go? Paging US Attorney Van Hollen, please pick up the corruption line....
Mmmmm! Green pork!
It's raining...pigs? But do they have wings?
Better not forget the umbrella. And the relish.
Can’t stand the guy, he was one of two (D)’s who succeeded in staying in office during the time when Indiana had a majority (R) (even Conservative) congressmen!!
Get rid of him, and Julia Carson!, and Baron Hill while you’re at it!!
There would be no need to return the money to his state if the feds didn’t take it in the first place. This is just another way to take it from the tax payer, send it to the feds and then redirect to the people they want to have it.
How about simply voting to take less money from the taxpayers?
Nope. Then people would get to spend their own money instead of having the government spend it for them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.