Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dixie Yooper
I’m all for a great defensive strategy, but when it comes to nuclear attack, it’s always better to strike first.

Ancient wisdom.

"If a man doesn't strike first, he will be struck first"
Athengoras of Syracuse

11 posted on 11/07/2007 5:57:38 AM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Diogenesis

In certain situations, striking first is always the best ploy. Specifically, Iran.

Should we decide NOT to hit them (I find this incomprehensible at this point in time) we will be hit first.

Russia for the most part has proven they will not launch a nuclear strike first — UNLESS there is a good reason to do so, like cleaning up a situation that we’ve found ourselves.

China on the other hand, is well known to be planning to attack the United States in the future, whether by nuclear weapons or sea/air attacks, it’s not clear, but certainly the ability to defend ourselves against ICBMs is the best possible thing we can have at this time.


27 posted on 11/07/2007 7:19:06 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson