Even worse, the Nuremberg Trials carefully document the "responsability" of the Germans in this massacre, thus absolving Stalin. This is why, BTW, you should think twice before citing these records in any serious historical debate. They are an embarassment. I use it as a litmus test for history books. Quoting the Nuremberg records is akin to quoting witchcraft trials minutes.
Strangely enough, “Rule of Law” is such a big issue for the 2008 US Presidential Elections. Since the Bush family is not running for this event, the argument of an “illegal war” isn’t an issue. The focus will be on the individual (vice party) candidates who have the best record of following the rules that common folk have to obey.
Hillary is the loser in this issue. Even though Obama is more likeable, his support for abortion is both anti-Muslim AND anti-Christian (since he tries to play both). This is similar to John Kerry pretending to be an Honorable Vietnam Vet who patriotically supports his own peer group as well as present soldiers serving America. It’s also similar to how Rudy Guilliani pretends to be a Catholic but is clearly against the Teachings of Christ.
Because God’s Law trumps whatever mankind can establish (and the human heart is innately attracted to Holiness), and because the Democratic party has written abortion into its platform, this means that no Democrat is an option for civil authority as their policy is tyranny and murder of innocence.
Since the “life” of “life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness” (U.S. Declaration of Independence) remains a term unrecognized and undefined, unborn life is as disposable to Democrats and their supporters as Polish soldiers were as disposable to Stalin and his NKVD. This is the loophole that an American husband used to starve his wife to death in Clearview, Florida.