Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill
The judge had no choice after the foreperson falsely claimed to have not guilty verdicts and having it read in court.

Thanks for the input; I actually understood that part. The mystery for me continues to be the consequences of the legal concept: mistrial...

12 posted on 10/22/2007 10:29:55 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Publius6961

In a mistrial it is as if the trial had never happened. The case can be retried before another jury. There may be a problem here since the verdict was announced. The question is that since jeopardy had attached and the verdict of acquittal was announced, would a retrial constitute double jeopardy?

Whether the judge has to accept or approve the verdict may be a question also.


13 posted on 10/22/2007 10:46:06 AM PDT by shankbear (Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson