Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

{SD Senator, Tim} Johnson to Run for Senate After Illness
AP via SFGate ^ | 10/19/7 | MARY CLARE JALONICK, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 10/19/2007 11:55:56 AM PDT by SmithL

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Democratic Sen. Tim Johnson said Friday that he will run for re-election next year as he continues his recovery from a life-threatening brain hemorrhage.

Johnson's announcement is good news for his party, because prominent Republicans have shied away from the idea of challenging the South Dakota Democrat after his illness and long recovery were closely watched in the state.

"After months of rehabilitation and recovery, more than a month on the job in Washington and after my recent trips back to South Dakota it is clear, to my family, my doctors, and me that I am able to do the hard work required of a United States senator," Johnson said in a campaign e-mail.

Johnson is still undergoing physical speech and physical therapy to address lingering effects of his hemorrhage. His right side is weak, and he uses a motorized wheelchair to get around the Senate.

Five Republican senators have said they will retire next year, giving Democrats an opportunity to expand the narrow majority they won in the 2008 elections. No Democrats have announced plans to retire from the Senate.

Johnson was considered a top Republican target before he fell ill. He won re-election against Republican John Thune in 2002 by just 524 votes, and Thune defeated Democratic Sen. Tom Daschle in another close race two years later.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: timjohnson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 10/19/2007 11:55:57 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Good to see the Senator is doing better.

However, from the article it appears that the GOP lacks the intestinal fortitude to take on Johnson due to his recent illness.

2 posted on 10/19/2007 11:59:10 AM PDT by trumandogz (Hunter Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Illness or no, there is no reason why the GOP couldn’t run an issues-oriented campaign against Johnson and beat him on his positions alone. No reason except that they’re afraid to for fear of looking like meanies ganging up on a cripple.


3 posted on 10/19/2007 11:59:10 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Illness or no, there is no reason why the GOP couldn’t run an issues-oriented campaign against Johnson and beat him on his positions alone. No reason except that they’re afraid to for fear of looking like meanies ganging up on a cripple.


4 posted on 10/19/2007 11:59:11 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Non-Sequitur
The problem is that they could not run a negative campaign against Johnson. Complicating matters is that it would be close in impossible to defeat an incumbent without negative campaigning.
6 posted on 10/19/2007 12:02:53 PM PDT by trumandogz (Hunter Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Just another arrogant, self-important congresscritter who just has to hold on to power no matter what.

Its too bad that he had a brain hemorrhage. That being said, I doubt that he can perform an effective job w/o being propped up by a bunch of staff.


7 posted on 10/19/2007 12:03:06 PM PDT by 43north (I hope we are around long enough to become a layer in the rocks of the future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Good to see the Senator is doing better.
However, from the article it appears that the GOP lacks the intestinal fortitude to take on Johnson due to his recent illness.

Yep. I don’t understand the GOP not running against him.


8 posted on 10/19/2007 12:04:25 PM PDT by Badeye ('Ron Paul joined 88 Democrats.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

I don’t understand the GOP!


9 posted on 10/19/2007 12:06:48 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 43north
That being said, I doubt that he can perform an effective job w/o being propped up by a bunch of staff.

You just described the overwhelming majority of all senators. Congressmen too, for that matter.

10 posted on 10/19/2007 12:08:30 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Good to see that he’s recovering.

We could do with a few less “johnsons” in the Senate however.


11 posted on 10/19/2007 12:11:11 PM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If Terry Schiavo had been a Democrat senator, she’d still be alive and casting votes today.


12 posted on 10/19/2007 12:11:23 PM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
the GOP lacks the intestinal fortitude to take on Johnson due to his recent illness.

Just like the Jeresy Girls were off limits.

13 posted on 10/19/2007 12:12:29 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
Is that a metaphor is see?
14 posted on 10/19/2007 12:13:34 PM PDT by bmwcyle (BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
I'm half awake.

Is that a metaphor I see?

15 posted on 10/19/2007 12:15:09 PM PDT by bmwcyle (BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
You got it - This is a Senate seat the GOP can and should win - If the GOP listens to the MSM telling them not to run here (because it could "look bad") they are bigger fools than I already think they are -

T. Johnson is wrong on a number of very important issues. Plain and simple. That he supports the disgusting ilk of the current DEM leadership is proof he no longer should remain in office.

We must win (have pick-ups) in SD and LA to have any chance in the 08 elections of staying close in the Senate.

16 posted on 10/19/2007 12:19:37 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
Well Mary, it’s pretty easy to see that what use to be a viable branch of American government has become a social club for the political elite. Instead of doing what is in best interest for the country, the dems and repubs want to be careful not to upset the “Good ole boy decorum.”

It appears to me that if either party felt that they could improve the American system of government and thus the American way of life they would run someone regardless of the existing situation.

17 posted on 10/19/2007 12:22:06 PM PDT by parthian shot (I can't stand much more of this!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Just like the Jeresy Girls were off limits.

This looks like a job for Ann Coulter. She'll say what others just think and sometimes type.

18 posted on 10/19/2007 12:22:14 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (It's Tribe time now!! It's Fred Thompson time in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
The problem is that they could not run a negative campaign against Johnson. Complicating matters is that it would be close in impossible to defeat an incumbent without negative campaigning.

LOL. Where did you come up with that theory, suck it out of your thumb? Why is it necessary to run a "negative" campaign to win and what constitutes being "negative?" SD is a very Rep state. Bush won SD in 2004 60% to 38.4%. A strong Rep committed to conservative principles should be more than competitive in any statewide race.

Johnson will have to demonstrate that he is physically able to fulfill the duties of the office. He will probably run a campaign designed to elicit sympathy. As long as the Rep candidate keeps the focus on the issues and Johnson's voting record, he/she will be able to make a race of it. Johnson's physical problems will be evident to the voters and don't need to be made an explcit issue by the Rep candidate.

Johnson only won last time by a little over 500 votes. He would be considered vulnerable this time no matter what his physical condition was. Johnson's 2006 ACU rating is 12 [compared to Thune's 100] and his rating in 2005 was 13. Johnson's lifetime ACU rating is 19.6. Also, compare that with Herseth's [Dem in Congress] ACU rating of 60 in 2006 and 33 in 2005. Johnson is way out of step with most of SD when it comes to the issues. The GOP should make Johnson's seat one of its top priorities in 2008.

19 posted on 10/19/2007 12:22:36 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

See my post #19. I agree with you completely. It is actually a good thing for us that Johnson is running. He will be easier to beat than if Herseth were the candidate. Johnson’s voting record is his biggest liability.


20 posted on 10/19/2007 12:26:28 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson