Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysts Find Israel Struck a Nuclear Project Inside Syria (partly constructed nuclear reactor)
NYT ^ | 10/14/07 | DAVID E. SANGER and MARK MAZZETTI

Posted on 10/14/2007 8:47:40 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Analysts Find Israel Struck a Nuclear Project Inside Syria

By DAVID E. SANGER and MARK MAZZETTI

WASHINGTON, Oct. 13 — Israel’s air attack on Syria last month was directed against a site that Israeli and American intelligence analysts judged was a partly constructed nuclear reactor, apparently modeled on one North Korea has used to create its stockpile of nuclear weapons fuel, according to American and foreign officials with access to the intelligence reports.

The description of the target addresses one of the central mysteries surrounding the Sept. 6 attack, and suggests that Israel carried out the raid to demonstrate its determination to snuff out even a nascent nuclear project in a neighboring state. The Bush administration was divided at the time about the wisdom of Israel’s strike, American officials said, and some senior policy makers still regard the attack as premature.

The attack on the reactor project has echoes of an Israeli raid more than a quarter century ago, in 1981, when Israel destroyed the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq shortly before it was to have begun operating. That attack was officially condemned by the Reagan administration, though Israelis consider it among their military’s finest moments. In the weeks before the Iraq war, Bush administration officials said they believed that the attack set back Iraq’s nuclear ambitions by many years.

By contrast, the facility that the Israelis struck in Syria appears to have been much further from completion, the American and foreign officials said. They said it would have been years before the Syrians could have used the reactor to produce the spent nuclear fuel that could, through a series of additional steps, be reprocessed into bomb-grade plutonium.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airstrikes; iaf; israel; nknukes; nuclearreactor; sept62007; syria; syriannukes; tlr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 10/14/2007 8:47:52 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; nw_arizona_granny; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 10/14/2007 8:49:34 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

American Liberals including DC Congressional Liberals must be furious that Israel struck one of their allies. Pelosi and Reid must be outraged that Israel had the nerve to strike Syria one of Pelosi’s pals.


3 posted on 10/14/2007 8:53:35 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Apparently, huh? Check out the 5th paragraph of this article...

Report: IAF strike targeted partly finished nuclear reactor in Syria

Since I'm not gonna register, maybe someone could tell me if that bit about evidence was in the NYT's story.

4 posted on 10/14/2007 8:54:22 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Okay, I need more caffeine. I read that wrong. Apologies to the NYT for my nasty thoughts. But I am glad the Israelis hit the reactor.
5 posted on 10/14/2007 8:57:40 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
apparently modeled on one North Korea has used to create its stockpile of nuclear weapons fuel

but it was just for peaceful purposes! The evil Israelis are without mercy! Quick, call Nancypants!

6 posted on 10/14/2007 9:02:30 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Already posted: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1910851/posts
7 posted on 10/14/2007 9:05:28 AM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

This is a nice story and all, but frankly it does NOT explain how or why Nuclear materials were found at the site, which was the apparent primer for bombing it. If it was under construction, Nuclear materials would have no reason to be on a construction site. This story does not pass the smell test.


8 posted on 10/14/2007 9:06:00 AM PDT by Danae (Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha (Smoke clears and Fred Thompson is President))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

More stupid “garbage” from the NY times. The story is not “the target” but the fact that Syria’s air defenses were BLIND. Israel F-15 went across the country, pounded the target and went home and NOTHING HAPPENED TO THEM.
Iran has just spent billions buying the same air defense system from Russia.
What does that tell you about their defenses?
A partially built reactor in Syria was the perfect TEST RUN.


9 posted on 10/14/2007 9:08:03 AM PDT by UltraKonservativen (( YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates were "particularly concerned about the ramifications of a pre-emptive strike in the absence of an urgent threat."

Syria having any kind of nuclear facility is an urgent threat in my mind. I thank Israel for taking it out now rather than later. The problem with waiting until later gives appeasers a chance to gain power and do nothing or even enable the enemy.

10 posted on 10/14/2007 9:15:09 AM PDT by PeoplesRepublicOfWA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“Some senior policy makers still regard the attack as premature.”That statement leads me to ask:1)Was Israel supposed to wait until the reactor was crankin out weapons grade material? and 2)Who are these so called “senior policy expersts”?


11 posted on 10/14/2007 9:17:08 AM PDT by Thombo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“Some senior policy makers still regard the attack as premature.”That statement leads me to ask:1)Was Israel supposed to wait until the reactor was crankin out weapons grade material? and 2)Who are these so called “senior policy experts”?


12 posted on 10/14/2007 9:17:40 AM PDT by Thombo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead
Pelosi is retaliating by possibly destroying the relationship between Turkey and the US. Link.
13 posted on 10/14/2007 9:17:58 AM PDT by upchuck (Hildabeaste as Prez... unimaginable, devastating misery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWA
I agree, but FWIW, that bit you quoted doesn't necessarily mean much. I'd be concerned, too. So what? Doesn't mean they weren't on board with the strike. I haven't seen that reported anywhere.
14 posted on 10/14/2007 9:18:06 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Good point. Thanks.


15 posted on 10/14/2007 9:23:44 AM PDT by PeoplesRepublicOfWA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

If anyone in the GOP can find their GONADS, they need to expose Pelosi for the moronic, anti-American, anti-military disgrace that she is along with her like-minded cohorts.


16 posted on 10/14/2007 9:24:22 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Thombo2

The state department is full of lefty career officials. The problem is they usually get the Republican secretaries of state over to their way of thinking.


17 posted on 10/14/2007 9:50:57 AM PDT by Oldhunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Danae
Nuclear materials would have no reason to be on a construction site.

The reactor was probably very close to being operational and therefore was near being loaded with uranium fuel. However, it takes years of operation for an operating reactor to breed enough plutonium for a bomb and then another year or two to separate the plutonium from the spent fuel.

You can of course make a bomb from highly enriched uranium but it is much more difficult and is probably beyond the expertise of jihadi states to produce a bomb made from uranium which is why they prefer Pu.

18 posted on 10/14/2007 9:52:21 AM PDT by seowulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thombo2

“Who are these so called “senior policy expersts”?”

State Department, no doubt.


19 posted on 10/14/2007 10:21:55 AM PDT by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWA
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates were “particularly concerned about the ramifications of a pre-emptive strike in the absence of an urgent threat.”

The Clinton’s were particularly concerned about a preemptive strike on Al Queda sponsor states in the nineties and did nothing; result 9-11. Israel can’t wait till the nukes go off, they have nowhere to run to, nowhere to hide.

20 posted on 10/14/2007 10:22:06 AM PDT by Old North State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson