Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question: Did President Lincoln Destroy The U.S.? (Vanity)

Posted on 10/14/2007 7:14:10 AM PDT by proudofthesouth

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: AuntB

Everyone writing on this thread has missed it.

Granting women full suffrage started the downhill slide of our great nation which continues to this day.


41 posted on 10/14/2007 8:14:56 AM PDT by ggekko60506
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: live+let_live

“The US is the most wealthy and powerful empire the world has seen since Rome.”

You are so right, but you forgot to mention what Rome’s final outcome was and why it happened.
I personally think that the US went downhill when it decided to allow people to immigrate who had no desire to integrate. Diversity doesn’t work.


42 posted on 10/14/2007 8:17:03 AM PDT by 353FMG (Government is the opiate of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

No FDR destroyed America, first with the great society then with all his concessions to Stalin. He had more reds in his administration then any other president in history. OH wait maybe not the Clintons any way. After FDR that is when the schools and other institutions started being taken by the Commies. Hollywood followed in the fifties and then all the colleges in the 60s. So no Lincoln didnt destroy america. The lefts American Idol did! PS Joe Mccarthy was a true american hero!


43 posted on 10/14/2007 8:17:32 AM PDT by crazydad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth
America began with an Age of Enlightenment pro-reason worldview as exemplified by the Declaration of Independence and Common Sense and has gradually been doing everything wrong to destroy that worldview ever since.
44 posted on 10/14/2007 8:18:03 AM PDT by mjp (Live & let live. I don't want to live in Mexico, Marxico, or Muslimico. Statism & high taxes suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
the downhill trend that you observe can be more directly linked to allowing women to vote .

...and teenagers, and homeless bums (motor voter act).

Throw in FDR's Social Security and Johnson's Great Society where people were taught that you can vote for money for yourself out of other people's pockets and I think that would sum up our nation's decline.

45 posted on 10/14/2007 8:21:13 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Take the wheel, Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: groanup
in my opinion, lincoln, the TYRANT & his merry band of war criminals, crooks & haters caused the fall of traditional LIBERTY in the USA.

since 1865 the USA has had the LUCK to NOT become a dictatorship, though it IS a plutocracy. FDR had the ABILITY/OPPORTUNITY to be the dictator in the 1930s. (he chose not to be.) later DIMocRAT politicians have not been as wary of seizing/using central power against the RIGHTS of citizens.

furthermore, i fear for the safety of the republic should the "hilleryBEAST" become POTUS. that will finish us, imVho, as a free nation. under a "hillery rotton klintoon" administration citizens will become SUBJECTS, imVho.

free dixie,sw

46 posted on 10/14/2007 8:21:45 AM PDT by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God. Thomas Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

Nah. The US decline started with Wilson’s plan to grab the Empire baton from England. This put us on British glidepath to the death of a thousand wars. Growth of Washington government control to control US society was the result.

Acceptance of George Washington’s admonition against foreign entanglements is our best chance for a reversal. But since both parties are dominated by trade and war interests, more control will continue to gravitate to Washington.


47 posted on 10/14/2007 8:22:12 AM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MountainPete

Hogwash. See my #9.

By making slavery a “state right” and seceding, the South chose to damage the Republic.


48 posted on 10/14/2007 8:22:54 AM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

I’ve always heard that LIncoln wanted to return the slaves to their country of origin. Obviously that never happened, but I have heard it said many times.

Lincoln dealt with a heck of a lot that would make other presidents cringe.


49 posted on 10/14/2007 8:23:57 AM PDT by television is just wrong (deport all illegal aliens NOW. Put all AMERICANS TO WORK FIRST. END Welfare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

I’ve always heard that LIncoln wanted to return the slaves to their country of origin. Obviously that never happened, but I have heard it said many times.

Lincoln dealt with a heck of a lot that would make other presidents cringe.


50 posted on 10/14/2007 8:24:06 AM PDT by television is just wrong (deport all illegal aliens NOW. Put all AMERICANS TO WORK FIRST. END Welfare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

I’ve always heard that LIncoln wanted to return the slaves to their country of origin. Obviously that never happened, but I have heard it said many times.

Lincoln dealt with a heck of a lot that would make other presidents cringe.


51 posted on 10/14/2007 8:24:22 AM PDT by television is just wrong (deport all illegal aliens NOW. Put all AMERICANS TO WORK FIRST. END Welfare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: live+let_live

Sarcasm on such an important and weighty topic?

tongue firmly planted in cheek...


52 posted on 10/14/2007 8:25:30 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ No more miller brewing products, pass it on....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

I can’t fault Lincoln for seeking to preserve the Union. The blame more likely can be placed on the Radical Republicans who stuck us with the 14th Amendment after Lincoln’s death. That set in motion the idea of egalitarianism and effectively repealed the 10th Amendment. I don’t think the authors and ratifiers of the 14th Amendment intended it to go as far as it has gone, but they were irresponsible in framing it so vaguely, including the citizenship clause which has been used to give citizenship to anchor babies.


53 posted on 10/14/2007 8:25:31 AM PDT by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

bingo...absolutely. The founding fathers knew darn well that women tend to be too emotional to be given the responsibility of voting.


54 posted on 10/14/2007 8:27:20 AM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: padre35
I disagree, the concept of “Local Control” is just as valid today as it was at the founding of our Republic, the people in a given region will know what is best for them rather then some Beareau office in Washington DC ever will.

I don't want to disagree or agree with you, some things I believe can be kept at a local level, but other things I believe need to push to the highest level of government that is possible. When it comes to the moral absolutes, I believe that we should fight those battles from a National level. That was what I believe the Civil War was about, should the States decide the moral absolutes or the federal government. In the case of the issue of perpetual slavery, the federal government won, instead of some small states run by the money from the big plantation slave owners. Our real downfall in our nation, if there is any, is that a lot of people our pushing aside the moral issues in favor for the perceived economic gain they can get from a particular party.

55 posted on 10/14/2007 8:27:46 AM PDT by ReformedBeckite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

I agree that allowing women to vote has had a progressively corrosive effect on the American character. Women view the world much differently than men and do not apply the same logic or rules. IMHO, many of the liberal male politicians know better, but are pandering to the female vote. On the flip side, they have also had a positive, tempering effect on some of our national policies. On the whole, however, I think it has been a net loss.

While the above is what I believe, it is impossible to make that argument in public without sounding like a neanderthal loon.


56 posted on 10/14/2007 8:29:19 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth
My only observation is that compared to Presidents' Lincoln and FDR, George Bush hasn't laid a glove on the CONSTITUTION!!

So you know where I am coming from I believe both Lincoln and FDR did what they HAD TO do to preserve the UNITED STATES of America.

57 posted on 10/14/2007 8:30:40 AM PDT by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

“you forgot to mention what Rome’s final outcome was”

You’re right, but I didn’t forget. My glaring omission was intended as a warning.


58 posted on 10/14/2007 8:30:49 AM PDT by live+let_live
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

I think America started going down hill when some freepers posted provocative posts and then weren’t around to participate in the debate!


59 posted on 10/14/2007 8:31:14 AM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
I would say that the downhill trend that you observe can be more directly linked to allowing women to vote ....

Yeah but then we won't have had a good looking president to look at like President Clinton.

60 posted on 10/14/2007 8:32:01 AM PDT by ReformedBeckite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson