Posted on 10/05/2007 6:05:05 AM PDT by pissant
LOL at you, laughing you to scorn.
Laughing it off is your only course, because you have no rebuttal to the fact that the scholars contradict Phyllis.
My daughter always thought Bush was the anti Christ, she may be onto something.
I wonder what kind of mark we will need to buy those Mexican products
To date you haven’t proven your case, Ben. So, I’m laughing at you.
Maybe you should go back and read those replies and the Hudson report itself?
Maybe you can show me where Hudson says what Phyllis says they say?
Now is the time and this is the place for you to prove it.
You apparently haven’t read all the posts between BillF and me. Take a look at his #55 and my reply to 55.
As for the Hudon report’s claim that SPP isn’t a prelude to the NAU, as Emerson wrote, “The louder he spoke of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons.”
LOL.
What is relevant is that all the security and prosperity plans are being implemented.
Most recently..............
FERC has OKed the connections between the Texas and Mexican grids,
Kansas City Southern will be building a new bridge across the Rio Grande, or, as some say, the Rio Bravo.
The first port expansion at Cardenas is complete.
According to the media, Congress will be appropriating billions for Mexican security.
This is another example of why you and I don't have to listen to mis-info from Phyllis. Rather than listen to her BS, we can go on the internet and we can read the NACC recommendations. For 2007, 2008, and 2010.
Now I don’t know what point you’re arguing. I thought the issue was whether Schlafly was making stuff up about the SPP being a possible lead-in to the NAU or not.
What Texas is doing in the case of those two small Texas power companies wanting to connect to Mexico is a bit disturbing. Texas has kept its grid independent of other U. S. States for many years, but now they’re willing to hook up to Mexico? Bizarre.
But there are a number of international bridges across the river between the U. S. and Mexico already, so your mention of Kansas City Southern’s plans is not a huge deal at this point.
BTW, just because you don’t understand the relevance of the Emerson quote doesn’t make it irrelevant. It’s right on the money.
No, the issue was that she was lying when she said that the "Scholars(at Hudson) explain president's plan for a North American Union".
She knows that she doesn't have much credibility so she tries to deceive you into thinking that a more credible source(to some) was in agreement with her.
I’ve written to her asking about that. I’ll let you know what she says.
Why even respond to these silly conspiracy theories? Its all moot anyway since citizenship is just a “state of mind”.
Um, did y’all see this????
LOL...that's why the last time I've seen you on a thread....it was AGAIN claiming that Schlafly is a liar and making misrepresentations/false claims/allegations. You just "love Schlafly" so much, all you do is dump on her and what she says.
‘merely a flesh wound’...
hehehe!
Thanks for the ping.
I’ve been lurking on this thread since it opened.
You’ve got mail.
okers!
Thanks for the ping... will read now.
I had missed it... and it’s even still in the “news” category! ;-)
Good stuff!
I should have pinged you to this one earlier today.
Lots of overlap to SPP
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1908554/posts
XXV Border Governors Conference - Text of Joint Declaration (signed by U.S. and Mexico Governors)
thanks! I’ll bookmark to read tomorrow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.