To: dead
The "diplomacy" was the threat of war with the US that caused the Russians to back down....When JFK does it, it's "diplomacy", when Bush does it, it's "hysteria." :>)
The difference, of course, Sadaam didn't back down. If the Soviets hadn't, I presume Paul would advocate leaving the nukes in Cuba.
12 posted on
10/04/2007 8:59:12 AM PDT by
SJackson
(isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
To: SJackson
Ron Paul = 21st Century Neville Chamberlain.
He would be dangerous if he weren’t completely insignificant.
15 posted on
10/04/2007 9:04:24 AM PDT by
Neville72
(uist)
To: SJackson
Paul would still be a better Commander-in-Chief than the Democrats. I don’t agree with him on Iraq but at least he’ll seal the borders and would wage war and let our troops fight without the politically-correct BS and going to Mother UN.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson