Skip to comments.
Some Canadian mothers forced to give birth in the U.S.
KOMO TV (Seattle) ^
| 10/04/07
| KOMO TV Staff
Posted on 10/04/2007 5:30:31 AM PDT by scooter2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Hey Hillary. This is what part of universal health care looks like.
1
posted on
10/04/2007 5:30:35 AM PDT
by
scooter2
To: Beowulf
To: scooter2
Hillary will put a stop to this. Before long we’ll be sending women to Mexico th give birth.
3
posted on
10/04/2007 5:34:02 AM PDT
by
FreePaul
To: scooter2
The American Government is kidnapping Canadian women and FORCING them to give birth here?
No one is being FORCED to have a baby in America.
Canada is refusing to permit Canadian women FROM giving birth there even though there is socialized medicine in Canada.
Wonder if we are getting any of Canada’s immigrant population (it’s a two-fer, they are they tied to America by the anchor baby syndrome).
4
posted on
10/04/2007 5:36:01 AM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: scooter2
GREAT!
More U.S. Citizens!
5
posted on
10/04/2007 5:36:37 AM PDT
by
traditional1
( Fred Thompson-The ONLY electable Republican Candidate)
To: scooter2
“Free” healthcare. Worth every penny you pay for it......
6
posted on
10/04/2007 5:36:50 AM PDT
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
To: scooter2
Exactly. But look how stupid the sheople are once they get "free" health care: Irvine and Ash are questioning Canada's priorities when it comes to health care spending.
Yeah it's just that the government doesn't spend like they should and has nothing to do with regulations, restrictions, loss of doctors, lack of innovation....nothing to do with freedom vs socialism.
And the best part: these babies are now citizens and will be able to get our "free" health care /s you know before the systems rots from the inside out thanks to socialism.
7
posted on
10/04/2007 5:36:58 AM PDT
by
socialismisinsidious
( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
To: scooter2
"We always regret when we have to transfer a baby or mother to another jurisdiction for care," said Canada's Health Minister George Abbott. Don't fear for your ego, George. When the U.S. gets socialized medicine, the high-risk babies can just die, and some of the mothers, too.
8
posted on
10/04/2007 5:37:28 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("This is funny." ~ last words of "Doc" Holliday)
To: scooter2
Yep. Welcome to HillaryCare.
Yikes.
9
posted on
10/04/2007 5:37:29 AM PDT
by
Shelayne
(NO running or relenting until the problem has been dealt with-decisively,systematically,permanently.)
To: scooter2
I wonder if Canada will be paying for these births? Or must U.S. taxpayers do so, as we do with the rest of the world who avail themselves of our health care.
10
posted on
10/04/2007 5:37:55 AM PDT
by
Joann37
To: scooter2
In the future, they will determine that this is not feasible because America under socialized medicine is also horribly backlogged (even for members of the NAUSSR).
So high risk pregnancies like these will have to be aborted for the protection of The State.
11
posted on
10/04/2007 5:39:38 AM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: scooter2
We cannot allow this to happen here! Canadians would then have nowhere to go!............
12
posted on
10/04/2007 5:39:47 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
To: scooter2
Not just "part" of it either ~ this is the whole thing ~ you want something special, like an emergency, or a boob job, or correction of a deviated septum, or whatever, you have to go to the United States 'cause Canada's UNIVERSAL health care system is UNIVERSAL only to the extent that they collect taxes to pay for it.
The system has nothing to do with care.
No one should discuss health care without making clear the difference between INSURANCE and CARE and PAYMENT. They are not directly related.
13
posted on
10/04/2007 5:39:48 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: scooter2
Where will we go if Hillary wins?
14
posted on
10/04/2007 5:40:41 AM PDT
by
TornadoAlley3
( An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping that it will eat him last..)
To: muawiyah
We here in the US actually DO have UNIVERSAL health care! It’s just that the Dhimmikratz won’t admit it!.............
15
posted on
10/04/2007 5:41:29 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
To: TornadoAlley3
16
posted on
10/04/2007 5:41:54 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
To: scooter2
Gee, I wonder if they will be U.S. Citizens? Will these Canadians claim their child is a U.S. Citizen?
17
posted on
10/04/2007 5:45:21 AM PDT
by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
To: scooter2
Will Hillary give these kids $5000 a piece?
18
posted on
10/04/2007 5:45:47 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
To: scooter2
"So two provinces didn't have enough room, so I have to go to another country," said Ash. And yet there are those who hold up the Canadian system as the ideal in twenty-first century health care!
19
posted on
10/04/2007 5:46:52 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: scooter2
That socialised medicine’s a real winner!!!
20
posted on
10/04/2007 5:47:05 AM PDT
by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson