Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney; tlj18

1. Let’s not confuse the “Russian theory” with the theories of this or that Western crackpot. Apparently, in Russia there is an extensive scientific literature on their theory, published in Russian. Do we know what it says? We have to, before we can think of rebutting it.

2. Don’t dimiss it out of hand because it came from the USSR. The Soviets generally produced solid science. Yes, there were episodes when the crackpots took over for political reasons (e.g. Lysenko) but not for a long time and not in the fields that mattered for national security. The fact that the theory was around for fifty years should tell us something. If it were outright nonsense it would’ve been thrown out of the window very soon after this fact became apparent. It must’ve worked, at least to a large degree.

3. Whether oil is or is not abiotic is a purely academic issue. Ultimately, all organic matter on Earth has abiotic origins. What really matters are practical applications. Perhaps the premises of the Russian theory are completely wrong, but if it makes predictions that helps the Russians find oil in places where it shouldn’t be according to the orthodox theory, if it’s the case we should look into that.

4. But, the objection goes, the Russians haven’t discovered much lately. Well, of course. Their economy just undergone a terrible crash; their oil industry has no capital and uses outdated equipment. This doesn’t mean that their theories are wrong.


16 posted on 10/03/2007 8:59:47 AM PDT by A Longer Name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: A Longer Name
Don’t dimiss it out of hand because it came from the USSR.

I don't. I've done oil field work for Russian clients in Siberia.

The fact that the theory was around for fifty years should tell us something.

The fact that in all that time it has not succeeded in finding oil tells me even more.

Whether oil is or is not abiotic is a purely academic issue.

No, the study of geology and the sedimentary layers is how oil is found, every single time.

if it makes predictions that helps the Russians find oil in places where it shouldn’t be according to the orthodox theory

It hasn't. No commercial producing oil well has been found by this method.

the Russians haven’t discovered much lately

Where do you get such information? Russia continues to expand their oil production into new areas. I've been involved in the design of some of the grassroot facilities.

20 posted on 10/03/2007 9:20:42 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson