Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/28/2007 1:27:42 AM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: familyop

Is this Treason? What exactly do you have to do to qualify?


2 posted on 09/28/2007 1:53:21 AM PDT by plenipotentiary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

Truth comes up.


4 posted on 09/28/2007 2:40:11 AM PDT by RusIvan (It is amazing how easily those dupes swallow the supidiest russophobic fairy tales:))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

It sounds like the US is offering the Russians a fig leaf to hide their inadequacies. By claiming the Russian missiles are still invulnerable, we can head off the political call for a new round of ICBM development by the Russians. The Russians don’t want to spend this kind of money, so they are happy to accept the falsehood.

It stands to reason that any interceptor fast enough to catch an Iranian missile would be fast enough to catch a Russian missile.


6 posted on 09/28/2007 2:46:55 AM PDT by gridlock (C'mon people now / Smile on your Brother / Everybody get together / Try to love one anoth-kaBOOM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

It’s gross obstruction and obfuscation from an anti-establishment 60’s child who simply can’t stand to see any form of US weapons proliferation. He knows he’s helping the Russian’s case.


7 posted on 09/28/2007 2:51:43 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop; anyone

Postol is always trying to say things that harm our ability to deploy a missile defense, even if he has to contradict himself.

Besides, isn’t this system designed to hit missiles that are basically overhead or close by? They can’t travel thousands of miles to hit a target moving away from them, right? Wouldn’t Russian ICBMs be launched toward the US on a path that wouldn’t take them close to these sites?


13 posted on 09/28/2007 10:56:47 AM PDT by michaelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

Let’s say this guy is correct. Russia could simply saturate the site with thousands of missiles. Then when there are no interceptor missiles left they are free to launch their ICBMs all they want. The fact is there is no way to defend against a massive ICBM arsenal, short of a star trek-type force field.


15 posted on 09/29/2007 8:17:50 AM PDT by Decombobulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson