Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CDN: Border guards flunking shooting lessons
The Windsor Star ^ | 9/25/07 | Doug Williamson

Posted on 09/26/2007 7:48:41 PM PDT by llevrok

They wanted to carry guns, but one in five Canadian border guards have been flunking their shooting lessons.

"Eventually, they will be armed. But not everyone is going to qualify," said Marie-Claire Coupal of Windsor, fourth national vice-president of the Customs and Excise Union, adding that the 20-per-cent failure rate applied across the board.

Coupal said part of the reason 20 per cent of trainees have been flunking out is the relatively short firearm training period of three weeks, compared with 16 weeks for RCMP officers. Most of the failures were in the 25-metre shooting qualification requirement - a long distance that doesn't reflect normal border conditions, she said.

As well, some officers needed fitness training so their arms remained steady during the shortened shooting training which caused fatigue.

Union national president Ron Moran said that last Friday, 24 out of 28 trainees qualified on their first try, reflecting changes made in the training program after the initial failure rates were noticed. He said those that initially failed to qualify should be given another chance. He added that the union is not advocating that unqualified offiers be pushed through.

"The employer has as much of a vested interest as we do," Moran said.

A spokeswoman for Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day said Tuesday that 20 per cent of the training class in July, and a smaller percentage in August did fail to qualify. But changes have been made to provide more coaching and 12 additional hours more practice time on the shooting range, for a total of 50 hours. In addition, other measures, such as not conducting the shooting range test on the same day as the written exam, have been implemented. She said the government expects the failure rate to drop when the September group graduates.

"The changes have been made," said Melisa Leclerc. "It can't be too easy (though)."

The government has announced that up to 4,800 land and marine guards will be armed eventually. This summer, 11 armed guards took up their posts in Windsor and Sarnia, and more were headed to Ottawa or B.C. for training. To date, 80 armed guards have been deployed across Canada. Airport border guards are not armed.

Coupal said the 25-metre precision shooting requirement is unrealistic under border conditions. "That's where we're losing most of our people. It's physically demanding on them."

Those who fail to qualify will get another crack at it, she added. "As it stands they're supposed to get two tries. They're just in the first round. These people will be going back for a second round."

Coupal said it is not known what will happen to those who fail to quallify.

"All that hasn't been worked out yet," she said. "I don't think that CBSA was ready for this."

Officers who qualify will carry nine-millimetre Berettas, and are also assuming more law-enforcement responsibilities. They'll be able to arrest and detain drunk drivers and people named in warrants until police arrive.

Leclerc said if an officer doesn't pre-qualify for training, or fails to qualify after two tries, every effort will be made to transfer him or her to a job where carrying guns is not required.

Initial estimates pegged the cost of arming Canada's border guards at $781 million, after the union lobbied for two decades for the right to carry weapons.

It is estimated it will take 10 years to complete the training and arming process.


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; bang; border; eh; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 09/26/2007 7:48:43 PM PDT by llevrok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: llevrok
25-metre shooting qualification requirement - a long distance that doesn't reflect normal border conditions

ROFL, send them to LA. They need some more cops that cant shoot.

2 posted on 09/26/2007 7:52:53 PM PDT by chaos_5 (... I'm just another angry white male ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

I once read in a California Highway Patrol magazine that the average gun fight range was 9 to 12 feet. This was was researched over 12 years .... so what’s with 25 meters? That’s like almost a hundred feet ... I say wait until they get closer .... I practice around 25 feet ....


3 posted on 09/26/2007 7:54:39 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("There is no distinctly Native American criminal class...save Congress - Mark Twain")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Initial estimates pegged the cost of arming Canada's border guards at $781 million, after the union lobbied for two decades for the right to carry weapons.
It is estimated it will take 10 years to complete the training and arming process.

Some significant somebody does not want this to happen.

4 posted on 09/26/2007 8:12:48 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Hitting a target at 80ft with a pistol, even a long and well balanced Beretta, is a LOT better shooting than you’ll see in 90% of LEOs in this country.


5 posted on 09/26/2007 8:18:14 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
so what’s with 25 meters

It's what separates the men from the boys!

6 posted on 09/26/2007 8:21:59 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

25 meters? with a pistol?


7 posted on 09/26/2007 8:29:54 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I will recommend 7.62x25 for that shot


8 posted on 09/26/2007 8:31:40 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

“Initial estimates pegged the cost of arming Canada’s border guards at $781 million....”

Geez, that sounds like an astronomical amount of $$ to teach 5000 guards. $156K each.


9 posted on 09/26/2007 9:27:42 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (This post sold by weight, not volume. Some settling of content may have occurred during shipment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Can’t qualify on a target at 25 meters? Good grief! Fatiguing? Come on! What a bunch of metrosexuals!


10 posted on 09/26/2007 9:30:49 PM PDT by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Standard military pistol qualification (stationary target). Not that hard to do with a 9mm or 45, on the US military silhouette target.

I’ve seen many soldiers (particularly in the Reserve Component) who have never fired a pistol qualify (even Expert!) on the 1st run after some instruction, dry-firing practice, and familiarization firing.

I’ve also seen those who shoot competitively fail to qualify, as well...


11 posted on 09/26/2007 9:31:30 PM PDT by castlebrew (true gun control is hitting where you're aiming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: castlebrew

25 meters with a 45? what do you do? aim at 35 degrees to the sky?


12 posted on 09/26/2007 9:34:58 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: castlebrew

Honestly, Ive never tried a shoot that long with a 45.
I’d, guess you’d have to aim a foot and a half to two foot high to even get close


13 posted on 09/26/2007 9:39:42 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mylife
I believe my .45 was zeroed at 25 yds from the manufacturer
14 posted on 09/26/2007 9:43:03 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Frankly, if I know there’s a fight coming, I’ll take 7.62x51, at that range, thank you very much.


15 posted on 09/26/2007 9:45:50 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: paul51

I wouldn’t want to go to court with that shot.

At 45 feet, all 45’s Ive shot including Kimbers will drop 6 to 8 “ from point of aim.

A shot outside of 25 feet is generally not seen as self defence. Of course this thread isnt about self defence.

I just dont see using a 45 for this kind of range as viable


16 posted on 09/26/2007 9:49:28 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

308 at 80 ft?

It would do the job :0)

I gotta hit the hay. I’m no cartridge expert


17 posted on 09/26/2007 9:52:54 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mylife
I agree that a shooting beyond 20 ft is going to be a tough sell. Your Kimber at 25 yds using 230gr ammo shouldn’t have a POI over 1.5 inches from POA. Same for a SIG 220
18 posted on 09/26/2007 9:54:54 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mylife

A pistol is an emergency piece of hardware.

If you expect trouble, bring a rifle.


19 posted on 09/26/2007 9:56:50 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: paul51

25 Yards? with a 45?

I gotta hit the hay my FRiend


20 posted on 09/26/2007 9:59:01 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson