Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK: Seized 'art porn' owned by Sir Elton John (being examined to determine if it's child porn)
The Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | September 25, 2007 | Sophie Borland and Nigel Reynolds

Posted on 09/25/2007 4:49:50 PM PDT by Stoat

Seized 'art porn' owned by Sir Elton John


By Sophie Borland and Nigel Reynolds
 
Last Updated: 4:49pm BST 25/09/2007

A photograph by a controversial American artist which is part of Sir Elton John's private collection has been seized by police from a gallery on suspicion it may have breached child pornography laws.

  • The image, which featured two young girls one of whom was sitting down with her legs wide apart, was taken by the renowned photographer Nan Goldin.

    The shot, from the artist's Thanksgiving series, was to be exhibited at the Baltic Modern Art gallery, Tyneside, this week along with some of her other work. But the day before it was due to be viewed by the public, police came and removed the image over fears that it might be breaking the law.

    It is thought that one of the assistant directors at the centre called in the authorities last Thursday after a private view as he was concerned that the picture could be offensive.

    The picture is now being examined by lawyers at the Crown Prosecution Service.

    Officials at the gallery confirmed that the police were involved but refused to say who had decided the picture should be removed.

    Peter Doroschenko, the director of the gallery, said: "I'm afraid I can't comment on this."

    Claire Byers, the communications director, said: "The police are involved in this incident and we are fully cooperating with their inquiries. That is all I can say on this at the moment."

    The image is being examined by police and lawyers from the Crown Prosecution Service are offering preliminary advice.

    A Northumbria police spokesman said yesterday: "The circumstances around who may have been involved in the production of the image and who may have owned it or owns it forms part of the investigation.

    "We attended the Baltic Centre last Thursday at the invitation of the management who were seeking advice about an item for an exhibition prior to it going on public display.

    "This item is being assessed and Northumbria Police, in consultation with the CPS, is investigating the circumstances surrounding it. The incident is ongoing and investigations are now being carried out."

    Goldin, 54, is well known for her shots of young, semi-clothed girls.

    Thanksgiving is described by the Baltic as an installation of photographs which documents Goldin's life from 1973 to 1999 - "a micro-retrospective of her career."

    In 2001, one of her photos featuring a very young naked girl looking up between the open legs of a semi-clothed older child had been criticised for making money from exploiting children. It was published in a book alongside similar works to accompany an exhibition at the Saatchi Gallery in north London.

    Goldin was born in Washington DC, ran away from home and was fostered by several families during her childhood. She moved to New York after graduating from art school where she took became known for pictures of alcoholics, drug addicts and Aids sufferers.

    She was admitted to rehab in the 1990s and much of her work since has reflected her own experiences.

    Sir Elton John has long been an admirer of her work and is also a close friend. He was not available for comment and a spokesman referred inquiries to the Baltic.

    This is not the first time an artist's pictures of children has been stripped from a public gallery over fears that it was obscene.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: britain; childporn; childpornography; eltonjohn; england; greatbritain; homosexualagenda; kiddieporn; perverts; porn; pornography; uk; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
More:

Child porn police seize gallery art Metro.co.uk

Child porn police seize gallery art
baltic centre gallery
 
The £46million Baltic Centre

Police have raided an acclaimed museum and confiscated a work of art alleged to be child porn.

Officers took away an image of a child from the £46million Baltic Centre in Gateshead.

Crown Prosecution Service lawyers are now considering whether the artwork breaches child pornography laws.

The allegedly offending image is not thought to have been seen yet by members of the public.

Police said they acted after being contacted for advice by managers of the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art on Gateshead's Quayside.

Artists displayed at the venue include American artist Nan Goldin, using photos donated from Sir Elton John's collection.

The rock star bought Goldin's series of pictures called Exhibition, after attending an exhibition 16 years ago.

Fellow US photographer Kendell Geers, accused by some critics of blasphemy, is also exhibiting at the centre.

But police and Baltic bosses have refused to name the artwork seized or the artist.

The gallery has attracted an estimated 2.5million visitors since opening five years ago.


1 posted on 09/25/2007 4:49:53 PM PDT by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Sir Elton is interested in girls?


2 posted on 09/25/2007 4:52:19 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Sir Elton is interested in girls?

I would suggest that one possible explanation for his ownership of this item is that because he doesn't care for women, he may have a less than healthy appreciation for their honor and dignity.  Therefore, he may see nothing wrong with the debasement of a young girl.

Wouldn't it be interesting to have this lead to a wider probe into his personal collection?  Who knows what might be found there........

3 posted on 09/25/2007 4:56:35 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Hey, if it’s “art” then “anything goes” - right? /s

It continues to amaze me how self-styled “artists” think that the more disgusting something is, the more avant-garde cache it deserves......


4 posted on 09/25/2007 4:56:48 PM PDT by Enchante (Democrat terror-fighting motto: "bleat, cheat, retreat & defeat, we suck on liberal teat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

“Sir Elton is interested in girls?”

I think he is more interested in helping a ‘friend’ who is.


5 posted on 09/25/2007 4:57:17 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Do a google images search on “Nan Goldin,” and you can see what this is all about.
6 posted on 09/25/2007 4:58:42 PM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Suck in all the idiots with this typical publicity stunt. Now we get to hear from Sir Elton as he makes an effort to make us all believe it is art while the politically correct idiots kiss his queer behind.


7 posted on 09/25/2007 4:59:51 PM PDT by Utah Binger (Sanctimony: Feigned piety or righteousness; hypocritical devoutness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Maybe.

But it’s shocking to see what passes as “art” these days. And this is coming from somebody that lives in an art hotspot and who grew up 2 miles away from a nationally renowned art museum in the Walker Art Center.


8 posted on 09/25/2007 5:00:07 PM PDT by TypeZoNegative (Trinidad&Tobago: Proof that a Muslim minority (5%pop) causes a majority of a country's problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
Hey, if it’s “art” then “anything goes” - right? /s

It continues to amaze me how self-styled “artists” think that the more disgusting something is, the more avant-garde cache it deserves......

When someone has no artistic talent, there's always a market for 'works' whose only claim to fame is in their shock value which is of course marketed as 'edgy' , 'groundbreaking' and 'cutting edge' and so is fawned over by the effete, sissified know-nothing snobs.

Michelangelo would likely die of starvation or be forced to be a truck driver to make a living in today's 'art' market.

"sigh"

(not that there's anything wrong with being a truck driver)

 

9 posted on 09/25/2007 5:01:15 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Utah Binger
Now we get to hear from Sir Elton as he makes an effort to make us all believe it is art while the politically correct idiots kiss his queer behind.

I have no doubt that he will play this for all it's worth, casting himself as a 'victim of homophobia' and how 'the evil, right-wing Neanderthal prudes' have no appreciation for 'quality art'.

Utterly sickening.

10 posted on 09/25/2007 5:05:19 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
I have always said that if I stand naked on top of my gallery building and drop $100 bills all day long, we would easily make the national press.

It’s art, not obscenity.

Problem is, I'm an ugly old fat fart.

11 posted on 09/25/2007 5:13:12 PM PDT by Utah Binger (Sanctimony: Feigned piety or righteousness; hypocritical devoutness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

If people are paying to see or own a piece of artwork or copies of that piece, or in some cases even if it’s just being displayed as ‘art’, it definitely needs a model release, which should be signed by the girls’ parents if the girls are under 18. Therefore, the issue of whether or not the girls were underage should be easy to determine. Unless, there is no model release, in which case the artist may get in trouble for lack of a model release. The artist is only going to be completely technically innocent if she can prove that everyone in the pictures are young-looking adults.


12 posted on 09/25/2007 5:15:41 PM PDT by Hyzenthlay (The ability to speak does not make you intelligent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

EJ is one messed up dude. Always has been. This does not surprise...


13 posted on 09/25/2007 5:16:28 PM PDT by Leo Farnsworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Goldin is not an exceptional photographer. She uses good equipment. Her fame is due to the nature of her subject matter and it’s appeal to the artsy crafty and their pervert friends. Some of her works appear, to me, to be serious mistakes, processed to look exotic. All she seems to have going for her is a strong stomach.
Any hippies in disagreement with me, please take a number, and get in line!


14 posted on 09/25/2007 5:17:45 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Sir Elton is interested in girls?

The young, boyish looking ones, it would seem.

15 posted on 09/25/2007 5:19:16 PM PDT by Redcloak (The 2nd Amendment isn't about sporting goods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

There is no such thing as “homophobia”. It is a marxist agitprop term to confuse the “mush-for-brains” moderates and “died-to-God’s forgiveness” Liberals.
This post illustrates that fear and lothing of queerness is NOT irrational - phobia=irrational (unfounded) fear.
Another term needs to arise and be used that is the correct description of opposition to queerism (sexual perversaty in all its variants) - one that comes from the conservative Christian perspective.
This term would necessarily be a perjorative as the “homos” view any other position than theirs as “hate speech”.


16 posted on 09/25/2007 5:20:29 PM PDT by buffaloKiller ("No liberal is my brother, under the skin they are Orcs. Serving and doing evil endlessly.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
I remember when rock was young;

Me and Suzy had so much fun......

17 posted on 09/25/2007 5:20:54 PM PDT by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

When you think about who was knighted back in the 15th- 16th century, they sure have lowered the bar. Johnny would be nothing more than a court jester back then.


18 posted on 09/25/2007 5:23:15 PM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

hey elton, prison ain’t so bad-three squares a day and all the sex you want.


19 posted on 09/25/2007 5:23:28 PM PDT by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

George Michael, Boy George, Pete Townshend, now Elton Queen. It’s dangerous to your masculinity to become a British rock musician.


20 posted on 09/25/2007 5:24:50 PM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson