Girlie man.
To: calcowgirl; SierraWasp; NormsRevenge
2 posted on
09/18/2007 11:21:35 AM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(Take the wheel, Fred.)
To: ElkGroveDan
Sold out to the public sector unions. Sad, because I really thought this is a guy who is NOT a career politician, and would stand behind his principals.
But then the nurses and others went on strike to protest, and Ah-nold terminated his efforts. Now he is just another go-along to get-along pol.
3 posted on
09/18/2007 11:23:18 AM PDT by
dashing doofus
(Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
To: ElkGroveDan
but, but, but, he was more electable than Tom McClintock
4 posted on
09/18/2007 11:23:49 AM PDT by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: potlatch; ElkGroveDan
For Arnold:
(30% off this week!)
5 posted on
09/18/2007 11:26:47 AM PDT by
devolve
( ------- ---When fiction becomes reality things get wet--)
To: ElkGroveDan
No surprise here, and I always said Arnold was the only kind of Republican (RINO) that could win in Kalifornia.
Your state has made Finestein and Boxer Senators for Life, remember? Its not like you have a viable block of conservatives living there.
No offense, but it is what it is.
6 posted on
09/18/2007 11:29:13 AM PDT by
Badeye
(You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
To: ElkGroveDan
Arnold lied...tax cuts died!
To: ElkGroveDan
May this be a forever remembered object lesson to those who vote for a candidate with a "sexy" image and a mouthful of high sounding platitudes. Demand to know what their policies will be BEFORE you vote, not what their focus grouped slogans are.
Unfortunately, it won't even be remembered by the CA primary on Feb. 5th. People will still vote for well delivered sweet nothings that made their panties damp.
8 posted on
09/18/2007 11:37:49 AM PDT by
LexBaird
(Behold, thou hast drinken of the Aide of Kool, and are lost unto Men.)
To: ElkGroveDan
I don't know how to sugar coat this, so I will just say it like it is -- he lied. He lied to me, he lied to his supporters and he lied to all Californians. When he campaigned for re-election last year, he said he was "moderate on social issues, progressive on environmental issues, and conservative on fiscal issues." Yep. He lied--and it was quite obvious. He's been raising taxes since the day he came in office!
First it was borrowing $15 billion to pay for operational expenses. Then diverting responsibilities to counties and cities without the corresponding revenue, causing local tax increases. Then increasing fees for anything in sight. Now ArnoldCare.
Glad to see Fleishman isn't providing cover anymore.
11 posted on
09/18/2007 11:44:19 AM PDT by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: ElkGroveDan
20 posted on
09/18/2007 11:58:12 AM PDT by
lowbridge
("We control this House, not the parliamentarians!” -Congressman Steny Hoyer (D))
To: ElkGroveDan
When you compromise and elect big government statists with an R next to their name, why are you surprised when you get a big government statist with an R next their name? Remember that this time around in the Presidential election.
33 posted on
09/18/2007 12:12:13 PM PDT by
mysterio
To: ElkGroveDan
You were fooled, huh Jon? Now you see the light. I saw the light last year and did not vote to re-elect him. I felt used after I voted for him the first time. I did not repeat that mistake again. Of course Red Arnold IS a liberal! That has been apparent for any one with brains who cared to look at his record. ArnoldCare is simply HillaryCare TM. The label is different but the approach is the same - the government forces us take health care on its own terms. I no longer live in California but I marvel at how many people were fooled for so long by the action superstar.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
35 posted on
09/18/2007 12:14:37 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: ElkGroveDan
I didn’t and wouldn’t vote for him; but I don’t understand why people are always on taxes,...rather than spending. Cut spending...hell, even I wouldn’t mind paying higher taxes if spending is cut in the long-run. It just makes more sense to start with the spending first.
43 posted on
09/18/2007 12:25:05 PM PDT by
Rick_Michael
(The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
To: ElkGroveDan; calcowgirl
Larry Elder & I tried to warn everyone in 2003, you can’t be a social liberal & a fiscal conservative at the same time.
Ya gotta pay for all those social programs some how.
I won’t say “I told you so.”
Too bad everyone who said they were going to vote for Tom McClintock in 2003 didn’t.
As it is, after three more years of RINOld, the CA GOP won’t be able to get a dog catcher elected to statewide office for at least another ten years.
56 posted on
09/18/2007 12:59:07 PM PDT by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: ElkGroveDan
I don't know how to sugar coat this, so I will just say it like it is -- he lied. He lied to me,... Dear Jon, What we had was wonderful, it really was!
But I have found a new love, and we are going to get married next week.
I know you will find someone new, really you will!
And I hope you and I can always be the best of friends.
Your forever and ever best friend,
Arnie
P.S. You better put some ice on that, Jon.
To: ElkGroveDan
“Don’t blame me, I voted for McClintock.”
85 posted on
09/18/2007 7:06:41 PM PDT by
Pelham
(The DREAM Act, amnesty by stealth + chain migration)
To: ElkGroveDan
To: ElkGroveDan
When AwwwwwwwwwwNold says:”Everything Is On The Table”he’s(obviously)referring to the wallets of CA.taxpayers!
To: ElkGroveDan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson