Posted on 09/15/2007 1:38:21 PM PDT by wagglebee
Vatican Statement Defends Pope John Paul II’s 2004 Allocution on the Moral Obligation to Care for and Show Compassion for All People Like Terri
Contact: Suzanne Vitadamo, The Terri Schindler Schiavo Foundation, 727-490-7603, info@terrisfight.org
ST. PETERSBURG, Fl., Sept. 14 /Christian Newswire/ -- By issuing its latest statement on the obligation to feed and hydrate those persons deemed to be in a "vegetative" or even comatose state, the Vatican today reiterated its two thousand year old teaching that all human life is sacred and deserving of our care, no matter its condition. The Terri Schindler Schiavo Foundation (Terri's Foundation) wishes to extend its sincere thanks to the Holy See for again repeating this vital truth.
Even if a person is severely injured, compromised or otherwise limited in his or her abilities, they still retain their "fundamental human dignity and must, therefore, receive ordinary and proportionate care" according to the Vatican. This includes providing them both food and water, even if by artificial means.
It is our fervent hope that the clergy, religious and those who administer Catholic health care, as well as the laity who persistently ignored the basic right to life of our daughter and sister Terri, and who persist to this day to dissent from this basic moral teaching of the Church by claiming that Pope John Paul II's March 20th allocution is "up for discussion", will begin to open their eyes and hearts to the immutable and incontrovertible truth re-affirmed by the Holy See today.
"We find it sad that many of those who claim to speak on behalf of the betterment of society and concern for the poor were against Terri and our efforts to care for her," said Robert Schindler, Terri's father.
As the Associated Press was quick to point out, "the Vatican condemned [Terri] Schiavo's death as 'arbitrarily hastened' and called the removal of her feeding tube a violation of the principles of Christianity and civilization."
Our fight continues every day to defend the lives of vulnerable persons threatened by new laws which redefine feeding tubes as "artificial life support" and also "medical futility" laws that allow hospitals, nursing and hospice facilities and family members to abandon our fellow human beings to a torturous death by starvation and dehydration or by any other means.
As we stated to His Eminence, Cardinal William Joseph Levada, Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in April of 2006, "Our goal is to defend the rights of our severely brain-injured or otherwise disabled brothers and sisters in the hope of preventing what happened to our Terri from ever happening to another."
Today's statement from the Vatican moves us much closer toward that goal.
About the Schindler Family: Mary and Robert Schindler as well as Suzanne Schindler Vitadamo and Bobby Schindler now work for The Terri Schindler Schiavo Foundation in St. Petersburg, Florida, an organization dedicated to promoting the Culture of Life, embracing the true meaning of compassion by opposing the practice of euthanasia.
And we need to remind everyone who those people were who wanted Terri to die.
Pro-Life Ping
Ping
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Y'all need to let go of this Schiavo stuff, it's like an obsession.
life
|
What the Schindlers said had nothing to do with Terri, they are concerned about how others who may fall victim to the culture of death.
Or are you suggesting that the entire pro-life movement should just shut down?
|
Then I am confused, what qualifications do you have to determine how a family can best honor the memory of a deceased loved one?
But there are more basic and primal rights that are due the respect of all persons and all officials. The Bill of Rights, for example protects freedom of assembly -- but does not protect the right to contract, the right to live, the right to marry, the right to property. Why does it not protect those basic, primal rights?
Because until recently our national ethos was higher, our forefathers could never have imagined those rights would be voided or harmed.
If one supports the Second, by what twisted logic can one justify that some Judge can order a person dead by civil order?
Great responses!
What's even more unimaginable is that people who profess to be conservatives would not support these rights.
|
Thank you and thank God for His Word.
I’m curious, does you theory of “let it rest” extend to Holocaust survivors?
What about America, should we just forget about 9/11/01?
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.