I guess the Penn State chemist who specializes in these matters referring to this discovery as, “the most remarkable in water science in 100 years” didn’t pass his junior high science class.
Why are Freepers such cynics and know-it-alls?
Maybe nothing will come of it. It still is an interesting discovery.
“I guess the Penn State chemist who specializes in these matters referring to this discovery as, “the most remarkable in water science in 100 years” didn’t pass his junior high science class.”
That’s why I say he’s doing a hoax to get funding for Penn State. He’s got to know the challenges. I’ll believe his pronouncements when I see them published in a good proper scientific journal.
We’re “cynical” because we apply critical thought processes to ideas presented to us. You know, thinking, like I was taught to do by a couple of great professors?
It isn’t an “interesting discovery.” This was “discovered” back when electricity was first put through water.
Lastly, we’re “cynical” about ethanol too — another great boondoggle that will take us nowhere closer to being able to flip the bird to the oil tyrants of the world.
I have yet to come to any (AND I MEAN ANY) energy thread on this forum that proposes a new concept, where the naysayers don’t completely destroy the thread.
EVERY SINGLE ENERGY CONCEPT WE UTILIZE TODAY, HAD NAYSAYERS TELLING EVERYONE IT WOULD NEVER WORK.
99.99% of the time they are right, but you know what, that one time when they’re wrong won’t get persued if they keep it up.
Let these things play out on their own. When it’s over, say, “That’s what I thought.” No big deal.
The claim is that they don’t want to see good money thrown away on a bad idea. But the truth is, any money that is spent on new ideas will get the same damned reaction out them, so what the hell does drive the real complaint anyway?
Do these folks all work for coal, oil and natural gas concerns, or are they just flat earthers afraid to see any new ideas tried. And don’t tell me everything has been tried before.
Hell, every new discovery proves that that idea hadn’t been tried before. But it is new, so naysayers naysay on...