To: italianquaker
Ron Paul is a doctor. If you were sick with cancer or any life-threatening illness, would you let Ron Paul treat you?
CHARACTER DOES COUNT.
45 posted on
09/07/2007 8:40:50 AM PDT by
ishabibble
(ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
To: ishabibble
47 posted on
09/07/2007 8:45:28 AM PDT by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: ishabibble
Ron Paul is a doctor. If you were sick with cancer or any life-threatening illness, would you let Ron Paul treat you? Yes, I would let him treat me.
On the same coin, would you want Dr. Kevorkian as President?
48 posted on
09/07/2007 8:47:05 AM PDT by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: ishabibble
Not after seeing that display on tv
50 posted on
09/07/2007 8:48:49 AM PDT by
italianquaker
(Is there anything Ron Paul doesn't blame the USA for?)
To: ishabibble
If you were sick with cancer or any life-threatening illness, would you let Ron Paul treat you?
Dr. Paul is an OB-GYN, so I'd probably pick an oncologist.
61 posted on
09/07/2007 8:56:38 AM PDT by
Xenalyte
(Can you count, suckas? I say the future is ours . . . if you can count.)
To: ishabibble
If you were sick with cancer or any life-threatening illness, would you let Ron Paul treat you?Hell no. I doubt his mental fitness for ANY complex task.
136 posted on
09/07/2007 10:36:16 AM PDT by
Petronski
(Cleveland Indians: Pennant -17)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson