Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant
But he’d probably register in single digits against Hillary.

That's what they said about the primaries and straw polls, but for the sake of discussion, let's agree to that assertion. We're back to the old argument of voting for principle or voting for another Rockefeller Republican, "compassionate" (read: Not) conservative that, in this election, will be the extinction level event for conservatism and, by extension, the Constitution.

12 posted on 09/05/2007 11:23:42 AM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: jammer
but for the sake of discussion, let's agree to that assertion

You don't have to do it. A Paul/Hillary match-up was done over a month a ago by a major pollster and showed him getting over 30 percent (despite his very low name recognition).

17 posted on 09/05/2007 11:26:22 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: jammer

Bush is not a Rockefeller Republican. At least not on social issues and judicial appointments. Maybe you’re a Rockefeller Republican on social issues and judicial appointments.


440 posted on 09/07/2007 9:42:28 AM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson