Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Turmoil of ’68, Clinton Found a New Voice (Barf Alert!)
New York Times ^ | September 5, 2007 | MARK LEIBOVICH

Posted on 09/05/2007 6:20:37 AM PDT by mmanager

WASHINGTON, Sept. 4 — In September 1968, Hillary Diane Rodham, role model and student government president, was addressing Wellesley College freshmen girls — back when they were still called “girls” — about methods of protest. It was a hot topic in that overheated year of what she termed “confrontation politics from Chicago to Czechoslovakia.”

“Dynamism is a function of change,” Ms. Rodham said in her speech. “On some campuses, change is effected through nonviolent or even violent means. Although we too have had our demonstrations, change here is usually a product of discussion in the decision-making process.”

Her handwritten remarks — on file in the Wellesley archives — abound with abbreviations, crossed-out sentences and scrawled reinsertions, as if composed in a hurry. Yet Ms. Rodham’s words are neatly contained between tight margins. She took care to stay within the lines, even when they were moving so far and fast in 1968. While student leaders at some campuses went to the barricades, Ms. Rodham was attending teach-ins, leading panel discussions and joining steering committees. She preferred her “confrontation politics” cooler

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 666; antichrist; clinton; hildabeaste; hillary; thebeast
The Slimes make her sound like Mother Teresa. Cold calcualating evil B**ch.
1 posted on 09/05/2007 6:20:40 AM PDT by mmanager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mmanager

This article is the hugest barf alert, a lesson in pure idolatry by the slimes.


2 posted on 09/05/2007 6:29:34 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

A commie, but not to shabby a pic that Drudge posted, though.

3 posted on 09/05/2007 6:32:25 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

I wonder what her ankels looked like back then?


4 posted on 09/05/2007 6:33:52 AM PDT by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
What do you make of this (excerpted)?
Typically, the paper, which received an A, was neatly typed, exhaustively footnoted and even included a page of acknowledgments. “Although I have no “loving wife” to thank for keeping the children away while I wrote,” Ms. Rodham said, “I do have many friends and teachers who have contributed to the process.”

Pandering even then to feminism and/or lesbianism? Self-revelation? But not to fret Hil, if someday you become President you too can have a wife.
5 posted on 09/05/2007 6:38:40 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib

Hillary has always had CRLs. Charging Rhinoceros Legs. And that includes ankles.


6 posted on 09/05/2007 6:39:29 AM PDT by CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

That’s not her.


7 posted on 09/05/2007 6:42:18 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
A commie, but not to shabby a pic that Drudge posted, though.

That’s not her.


That picture looks like no other from that period of her life. It cannot be the Hillary we know. She was definitely a two-bagger in every other picture.
8 posted on 09/05/2007 6:52:50 AM PDT by JayNorth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
Good photo to warn college women - as a before and after.

Before turning Commie

After turning Commie

9 posted on 09/05/2007 6:52:59 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JayNorth

I think it’s probably her. Just very favorable angle, lighting, etc.

It’s like the one lucky shot where we look good that we all have somewhere and cling to!


10 posted on 09/05/2007 7:05:40 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All
A picture of Hillary from 1968 showing her having clean hair, make-up and decent clothes? No way.

That git was revolution to the max back then and that kinda thing just wasn't done if one wanted to stay up with the latest anti-establishment fashion trends.

11 posted on 09/05/2007 7:41:27 AM PDT by RedsHunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
It’s like the one lucky shot where we look good that we all have somewhere and cling to!

I'm still waiting for my "one lucky shot"...but there's always PhotoShop.
12 posted on 09/05/2007 9:57:33 AM PDT by JayNorth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

Myrna Minkoff for President!


13 posted on 09/05/2007 12:06:02 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson