Posted on 09/03/2007 9:08:54 AM PDT by Reaganesque
From Rossputin:
Historically, the Iowa Caucuses and the New Hampshire Primary have received the perception of being, if not president-makers, at least highly reliable launching points for presidential aspirants.
Indeed, these early contests correctly predicted the final choice of nominee five out of seven times for each party. Iowans views were not shared by the rest of the country on the Democratic side in 1992 (Tom Harkin won) and 1988 (Dick Gephardt), and on the Republican side in 1988 (Bob Dole) and 1980 (George H.W. Bush). New Hampshire didnt create a victor on the Democratic side in 1992 (Paul Tsongas) and 1984 (Gary Hart), and on the Republican side in 2000 (John McCain) and 1996 (Pat Buchanan).
And while batting over .700 is impressive, there are strong reasons to question whether these initial matchups are now as important or reliable indicators as they used to be.
Notice is being taken of Mitt Romneys lead over Rudy Giuliani in these two states....
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Intrade Political 'Securities' Percentage US$ Traded
Mitt Romney to Win 60.0% $940
Rudy Giuliani to Win 15.0% $1.4K
Fred Thompson to Win 15.0% $470
Mike Huckabee to Win 3.0% $200
Reflects poorly on Romney's conservatism if he is attracting the McCain crowd.
Romney is moving into the first tier of the Republican field.
Gives me another reason to write-off Romney.
You needed another? :)
He’s still better than Juliani...
Iowa
Romney: 35%
Giuliani: 12%
Thompson: 11%
Huckabee: 11%
Michigan
Romney: 25%
Giuliani: 23%
Thompson: 16%
McCain: 15%
Nevada
Romney 28%
Giuliani 18%
Thompson 18%
McCain at 8%
New Hampshire
Romney 27%
McCain 16%
Giuliani 15%
Fred Thompson 12%
Huckabee 5%
Great News on the Polling Front
Two new polls show Romney statistically tied for second place and trending up (even in the south - oh my!).
South Carolina
Thompson - 22%
Giuliani - 18%
Romney - 17%
McCain - 11%
Huckabee - 7%
Brownback - 3%
Paul - 2%
All others - 1% or less
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/surveys/PPP_SC_Release_081507.pdf
And then the Nationwide Poll:
Giuliani 27% (30% in July)
Romney 16% (10% in July)
Thompson 16% (17% in July)
McCain 13% (14% in July)
http://www.scforromney.com/
Sounds like Romneys plan for gradual and consistent improvement in paying off. Its a marathon and not a sprint, and the numbers reflect a well-executed strategy!
http://www.scforromney.com/
It should be noted that those Intrade numbers are for the 2008 Iowa Caucus ONLY.
For the nomination ITSELF, the Intrade percentage probabilities are:
38.6 Giuliani
23.6 Romney
22.0 Thompson
04.2 McCain
04.0 Paul
03.4 Huckabee
03.2 Gingrich
00.5 Rice
00.3 Hagel
00.1 J Bush, Tancredo
Candidates not listed above are so unlikely that no one is willing to buy their contracts.
For Mr. Romney, the race will depend on Florida.
Excellent, thanks.
South Carolina sure is a wild ride. I’ve seen polls in the last few months with three different candidates at the top.
I don’t get it. I thought any candidate who came out against the amnesty bill was toast in Florida?! No, seriously. When Mitt started blasting Rudy on sanctuary cities, I believed he was writing off Florida in hopes that he could at least finish 2nd in South Carolina and knock off Rudy before he even gets to Florida.
And then the Nationwide Poll:
Giuliani 27% (30% in July)
Romney 16% (10% in July)
Thompson 16% (17% in July)
McCain 13% (14% in July)
http://www.scforromney.com/
>>>.Reflects poorly on Romney’s conservatism if he is attracting the McCain crowd<<<
Or perhaps the uneducated became educated, Mr. Sour Grapes.
McCain is totally out of this race and has been almost from the start
His ability to build organization in Iowa and New Hampshire has been good. He just needs to repeat that performance in Florida if he's going to win the nomination.
If I were him, I would have attended the Texas straw poll. Even if he didn't do well, making an appearance would have helped him make an impression on the Texas voters. The Texas primary may be too late to make a difference, but he might have raised some money and helped himself in some national polls.
Experienced professional staffers move among campaigns with ease every four years. It's their bread and butter, they adapt, and they do what their boss tells 'em to do. If they don't, they'll never be hired in the future by leading contenders for high office.
There's something that McCain fans must see in Thompson that they don't like.....and I'll venture a guess what it is......
A solid conservative BACKBONE !
Leni
A conservative backbone that has ducks out of yet another debate and avoids confrontation or the airing of views?
I guess we have different opinions as to what constitutes “backbone.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.