Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
How did Democratic presidential front-runner Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign fail to see the red flags in Hsu's contributions?

They didn't fail to see them. They were complicit.

L

3 posted on 09/01/2007 7:42:27 AM PDT by Lurker ( Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing smallpox and ebola.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

They didn’t fail to see them. They were complicit.
:::::
Of course they are COMPLICIT...such a nice word for slime like the Clintons. They have been taking money from every American enemy who either wanted our technology or influence over American foreign policy. These “political donors” are not giving the Clintons (and other Dems) money for NOTHING - THEY ARE BUYING INFLUENCE AND INFORMATION....The Clintons should have been put behind bars a very long time ago high treason and betrayal, when China Gate became clear.

And America just stands there.....


11 posted on 09/01/2007 7:50:59 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
They didn't fail to see them. They were complicit.

Remember when she listed her contributions from the American Muslim Council as the American Museum Council and then claimed it was an accidental misspelling?

I gotta wonder when the pile of their scams gets so high and heavy that it becomes too much even for the sheep.

60 posted on 09/01/2007 9:41:24 AM PDT by Sal (My "good" Senator Kyl exposed himself as a Grand Betrayer, corrupt to the core!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

It’s part of a long pattern of corrupt Clinton practices.


63 posted on 09/01/2007 10:00:14 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson