LA Times, Dan Morain....
- When a campaign has attracted more than 500,000 donors, as Clinton's has, there is no way a candidate's staff can check out each contributor.
- Clinton and her aides said there was little they could have done to protect themselves....
I had to read the above a couple times.
The way its written the first part gives the impression that it's a quote from the Clinton people. But no, that's non partisan 'journalist' Dan Morain doing a little CYA for the hag.
Not to mention it's utter BS. Ole Norman wasn't giving $20 at a time on his VISA. His 'HUGH' donations would stick out like a sore thumb.
Clinton and her aides said there was little they could have done to protect themselves....
What complete rubbish. A campaign loaded with seasoned ooperatives does not have a system in place to check out at least the large contributors? Then they are incompetent at best and should not be running the largest economy in the world.
Think about it: The first thing any policitian anywhere learns about are donations and the laws governing donations. For any sitting Senator to tell us they had no way of complying with the laws is ridiculous.
It begs the question: What other laws can they NOT comply with?