Replies

To: sheana

The ruling, issued Thursday, dealt only with whether the plaintiffs could challenge the 2004 Kansas law and did not address the merits of the law.

In other words the headline is pure propaganda and has nothing to do with the ruling.

Just the MSM pushing their addenda.

4 posted on 08/31/2007 1:00:31 PM PDT by Hazcat (We won an immigration BATTLE, the WAR is not over. Be ever vigilant.)

To: Hazcat

addenda = agenda

5 posted on 08/31/2007 1:02:01 PM PDT by Hazcat (We won an immigration BATTLE, the WAR is not over. Be ever vigilant.)

To: Hazcat

Ahhhhh......thanks.

8 posted on 08/31/2007 1:06:59 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Being Challenged Builds Character! Being Coddled Destroys Character!)

To: Hazcat

I read the article twice and still cannot figure out the logic of the ruling.

20 posted on 09/01/2007 2:16:41 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794