Posted on 08/26/2007 11:38:02 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
Bill’s only going to be the back seat driver in this administration, and frankly, I don’t see how we can stop her. I think that Hillary was right when she said that only another terrorist attack would change the public opinion about Republicans.
The worst part about the public perception of Republicans is that we are seen as old, and maybe most of us are old.
I think she could easily pick up all of those states, if we pick the wrong candidate.
At this point, I completely doubt there’s anything more to know about Hillary that isn’t already known - and completely ignored - by most of the populace. If anything, people who don’t ALREADY hate her will just stand by her more strongly because she is being attacked again. People who already DO hate her don’t need any more motivation.
What we need to be worrying about is insuring we get a nominee who doesn’t have even more ugly baggage than Hillary does.
Yes. Another Bob Dole would guarantee a Hillary presidency.
I'm sure it's been well covered by the MSM. Like how they report on the multiple death threats against Bush posted on "mainstream" sites like Daily Kos and DU. I notice how even at FR the "hate" for democrats never reaches that level, but somehow it's newsworthy for someone to actually bankroll an anti-Hillary site and call him some out of control lunatic.
they’re still angry about kerry’s “service in vietnam”!
unbelievable.
they assume that since kerry was there a short while, that his service is equal to those who served 12 or 13 months.
and, talk about propaganda—none of my tv-moron neighbors that vote democrap still understand that kerry went to paris, france and talked to the north viets.
Bring it on Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hate is too mild a word to describe my feelings and thoughts towards both Clintons.
Every old charge, it seems, is being repackaged and sold as new.If the MSM would have reported the truth 10 years ago, this would not be necessary! Besides, some voters have a short memory
. . . and a few, having been children in 2000, have no memory at all of the Clinton Administration - or any other Democrat maladministation.This denigration of the "old" is part of the ineluctable superficiality of journalism. But rest assured, retrospectives on Watergate are never denigrated as "old charges repackaged and sold as new."
Nor do they probably understand that his discharge was likely not honorable.
Like Bush's National Guard records being packaged by the MSM as new complete with new documents made to look old.
Some reporters have no memory at all when it comes to the biased sliming of the Republican candidates they routinely engaged in.
The author sounds a little worried if you ask me.
We must be ready for the MSM to pull some tricks just before the election. The left will be manufacturing lies the will make Rathergate look tame. Timing the release of the lies will be managed better by the media to maximize damage to the Republican candidate while minimizing time to respond with facts.
At this point, I completely doubt there’s anything more to know about Hillary that isn’t already known - and completely ignored - by most of the populace.”
Do you personally know “Most of the population”?
I know many people who were completely ignorant about Clintonion crimes.
your forgetting the DUI in maine.
I was about to put that in the response but left it out. The MSM brought that up both in 2000 and 2004 as if it were a big new revelation to them. We just have to be ready to counter the dirt they manufacture rather than the old stories they sell as new.
WRONG: ...”serves as a researcher for Paul, a former Clinton fundraiser. (Published in the Chicagoland Early Edition)”
CORRECT: Paul is a former Clinton DONOR, who spent over $1.6 mil for her campaign and watched his company get wrecked by the Clintons in the bargain
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.