1 posted on
08/24/2007 5:10:14 PM PDT by
nuconvert
To: Valin; AdmSmith
2 posted on
08/24/2007 5:11:28 PM PDT by
nuconvert
("Terrorism is not the enemy. It is a means to the ends of militant Islamism." MZJ)
To: nuconvert
da terra bizness just ain’t wuddit used to be.
To: nuconvert
Despite massive efforts by radical anti-war militants, the new Democrat leadership in the US has refused to help Al Qaeda realize its goals in Iraq. The new emerging consensus in the US is that the American-led coalition ought to remain in Iraq at least until the next Iraqi general election in 2009. The idea is also backed by the Iraqi government and parliament. Terror fails when people refuse to be terrorized. And this may be happening in Iraq. In spite of the liberals trying to defeat George Bush's war against terrorism, their efforts may be their Waterloo. We can only hope.
4 posted on
08/24/2007 5:15:49 PM PDT by
Stars&StripesNE
(Liberals are the enemy within)
To: Kaslin; Tut
5 posted on
08/24/2007 5:17:24 PM PDT by
Stars&StripesNE
(Liberals are the enemy within)
To: nuconvert
Yep. If Al Qaeda cannot win in Iraq, it can't win anywhere. This is bound to demoralize jihadists and suppress their fund-raising and recruitment. No one wants to die for a lost cause.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
7 posted on
08/24/2007 5:29:08 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: nuconvert
In World War II, we learned how to break the will of those fighting us. We fire bombed them and saved over 500,000 of our own troops.
8 posted on
08/24/2007 5:29:12 PM PDT by
RC2
To: nuconvert
Despite massive efforts by radical anti-war militants, the new Democrat leadership in the US has refused to help Al Qaeda realize its goals in Iraq.Well, there's some spin. The new democrat leadership tried it's best to force a premature withdrawal, which would have resulted in an al Qaeda victory. They don't get credit for failing to achieve the goal they sought.
To: nuconvert
11 posted on
08/24/2007 5:33:18 PM PDT by
Danae
(Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha (Smoke clears and Fred Thompson is President))
To: nuconvert; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Despite massive efforts by radical anti-war militants, the new Democrat leadership in the US has refused to help Al Qaeda realize its goals in Iraq... so the liberals who do help Al Qaeda realize its goals in Iraq are nothing but anti-war militants now?
I'm so confused...
17 posted on
08/24/2007 5:59:11 PM PDT by
Fred Nerks
(Fair dinkum!)
To: nuconvert
AQ has lost in Iraq, they just won't admit it. But, when they do, they'll need a big PR target in the US to lift their spirits and recruitment.
Mass transit or car ferrys will be next.
19 posted on
08/24/2007 6:10:52 PM PDT by
leadhead
(Democracy can withstand anything but democrats)
To: nuconvert
Excellent article except for this statement:
Despite massive efforts by radical anti-war militants, the new Democrat leadership in the US has refused to help Al Qaeda realize its goals in Iraq
No Sir, the new Democrat leadership always have wanted to surrender to the terrorists but they were crushed by our President and our troops who are winning the war on the battlefields of Iraq.
23 posted on
08/24/2007 7:16:35 PM PDT by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson