Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PICTURES: RAF Typhoon intercepts Russian Tupolev Tu-95 bomber
www.flightglobal.com ^ | 22/08/07 | Craig Hoyle

Posted on 08/22/2007 10:50:33 AM PDT by Freeport

In a scene reminiscent of the Cold War, a Russian air force Tupolev Tu-95 bomber is pictured being intercepted by a Royal Air Force fighter before approaching too close to UK airspace on 17 August.

But for the first time, the aircraft providing so-called quick reaction alert (QRA) cover is a Eurofighter Typhoon F2 from the RAF's 11 Sqn - the unit tasked with leading the type's evolution into a multirole fighter also capable of performing ground-attack duties in Afghanistan from July 2008.

Russian bombers have been intercepted by UK fighters on several occasions so far this year, with their presence reflecting President Vladimir Putin's eagerness to underline Moscow's military capabilities as it stakes claim to Polar mineral resources and approaches national elections to take place early next year.

Previous meetings have been between Tu-95s and RAF Panavia Tornado F3 interceptors, with the latter gradually handing over QRA responsibility for the southern UK to Typhoons from RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire. The latest encounter took place over the North Atlantic, according to the RAF.


(Excerpt) Read more at flightglobal.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Russia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aviation; coldwar2; nothingnewhere; raf; russian; tu95
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 08/22/2007 10:50:35 AM PDT by Freeport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Freeport

“Tupolev” They’re called ‘bears’ and the RAF escorts them out of the North Sea daily!


2 posted on 08/22/2007 10:52:20 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Stay together, pay the soldiers and forget everything else." Lucius Septimus Severus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freeport

Dang. Everyone gets to post this article.


3 posted on 08/22/2007 10:53:14 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
“Bear” is the NATO designation, not the Russian. The Tu- designation is correct.
4 posted on 08/22/2007 10:53:29 AM PDT by Freeport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Prop bombers?........


5 posted on 08/22/2007 10:55:04 AM PDT by Red Badger (ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut

Aviation ping...


6 posted on 08/22/2007 10:55:09 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
"“Tupolev” They’re called ‘bears’ and the RAF escorts them out of the North Sea daily!"

Yeah, we know, but it's Elvis month.

It's Tupelo, honey!

7 posted on 08/22/2007 10:56:30 AM PDT by battlegearboat (Driving Miss Danny Glover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Freeport

This business of allowing “probing” of the air defenses is crazy. The policy should be to let them incur without challenge, then shoot them down without warning. Otherwise, they will be able to map out your air defense capabilities. If they are going to do it, it ought to COST.


8 posted on 08/22/2007 10:57:13 AM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman
I’m sure there’s a pilot or three who would agree with you, but politically...

Personally, I think a few Tu-’s KO’d would be a good thing... Just an opinion though...

9 posted on 08/22/2007 10:59:45 AM PDT by Freeport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The Tu 95 “Bear” has turbo prop engines and is a contemporary of the B-52.


10 posted on 08/22/2007 11:01:00 AM PDT by Nakota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nakota

We oughta sell them some........


11 posted on 08/22/2007 11:01:57 AM PDT by Red Badger (ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman
Yeah, if they can shoot down Korean civilian jets and kill hundreds, down a couple of military bombers and give them a taste of their own medicine.

Korean Air Lines Flight 007, also known as KAL 007 or KE007, was a Korean Air Lines civilian airliner shot down by Soviet jet interceptors on September 1, 1983 just west of Sakhalin island. 269 passengers and crew, including US congressman Lawrence McDonald, were aboard KAL 007; there were no survivors.

The Soviet Union stated it did not know the aircraft was civilian and suggested it had entered Soviet airspace as a deliberate provocation by the United States, the purpose being to test its military response capabilities, repeating the provocation of Korean Air Flight 902, also shot down by Soviet aircraft over the Kola Peninsula in 1978. The incident attracted a storm of protest from across the world, particularly from the United States.

12 posted on 08/22/2007 11:02:16 AM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yep...sixty-year old technology that still works today as good as it did in the 1950s.


13 posted on 08/22/2007 11:05:01 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman

I like your reasoning, Watchman.


14 posted on 08/22/2007 11:06:15 AM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rednesss
The incident attracted a storm of protest from across the world, particularly from the United States.

Yea, those "storms of protest" have really been effective in dealing with other countries.

15 posted on 08/22/2007 11:06:55 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Yeah but this time we're not treated to photos of 60's vintage lightnings and 40's vintage spitfires as we were in

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1884440/posts

16 posted on 08/22/2007 11:08:14 AM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman
This business of allowing “probing” of the air defenses is crazy. The policy should be to let them incur without challenge, then shoot them down without warning

Thing is they don't actually enter the airspace, just come close.

17 posted on 08/22/2007 11:08:42 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Freeport

Search for these to see more
PICTURES: RAF Typhoon intercepts Russian Tupolev Tu-95 bomber

Posted by Freeport
On News/Activism 08/22/2007 1:50:33 PM EDT · 12 replies · 516+ views

www.flightglobal.com ^ | 22/08/07 | Craig Hoyle

U.K. Scrambles Typhoon Jets to Shadow Russian Strategic Bomber

Posted by maquiladora
On News/Activism 08/22/2007 7:26:02 AM EDT · 25 replies · 636+ views

Euronews ^ | Aug. 22

UK Typhoons shadow Russian bomber

Posted by Caledonia2007
On News/Activism 08/21/2007 4:01:43 PM EDT · 52 replies · 1,185+ views

BBC ^ | Tuesday, 21 August 2007,

RAF Eurofighters Intercept Russian Bomber (Typhoon’s First Scramble)

Posted by zencat
On News/Activism 08/21/2007 3:51:14 PM EDT · 31 replies · 1,200+ views

UK Telegraph ^ | 08/21/2007 | Richard Holt


18 posted on 08/22/2007 11:08:47 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

Stop, or I’ll say Stop again!!!


19 posted on 08/22/2007 11:11:12 AM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman

Spoken like a man with a 1000’ deep bunker or access to goobermint shelters.


20 posted on 08/22/2007 11:11:16 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson