Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the invisib1e hand
It could have been taken down in single stroke years ago, but no, not in NYC.

I was wondering why it was not taken down with an implosion? Not to be flippant, but they certainly have the experience in clearing up rubble!

4 posted on 08/19/2007 7:52:46 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Red_Devil 232

because ground zero is “sacred ground,” which is something of a sexual fantasy to politicians, which, in NYC, are outnumbered only by unemployed and washed-out actresses.


6 posted on 08/19/2007 8:00:27 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Hate me, I'm white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Red_Devil 232

I don’t think they do implosions in crowded urban areas. Even though it looks like implosions are nice clean ways to take down buildings, they still send out debris for blocks. It can work if there is nothing else around (See the Kingdome, which was surronded by parking lots).


9 posted on 08/19/2007 8:34:04 AM PDT by sharkhawk (Bear Down Chicago Bears)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson