[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

” It said an investment of $800 million to $1 billion could produce more than 100 gigawatts of electricity by 2050...”

I assume the author meant to say “gigawatt hours of electricity”. Anyone purporting to report on technical matters should try to get the concepts and terminology down.

[FRForever]

> I assume the author meant to say “gigawatt hours of electricity”.

Why? Such an investment would generate a continuous flow of electricity, hence “gigawatts” not “gigawatt hours”.