Misreading Christopher Hitchens

contentions ^ | 8.9.2007 | James Kirchick

[Contentions]

Say what you will about Christopher Hitchens—his views on Israel, most exhaustively rendered in a book he co-authored with the late Edward Said, leave much to be desired—but he is the most eloquent and passionate opponent of Islamic jihadism writing today. He is also a passionate critic of all forms of religious hucksterism, and offers the most concise and devastating rebuke of Al Sharpton in the current issue of Vanity Fair: “A man who proves every day that you can get away with anything in this country if you shove the word ‘Reverend’ in front of your name.”

Anyone who writes honestly and bluntly about Islam inevitably is labeled a “racist,” an appalling misunderstanding of the word, since it can be applied only to those who abjure someone for the pigmentation of their skin, not their belief system. In a diatribe against the popular and engaging blog associated with the online magazine Jewcy, Richard Silverstein, a contributor to Tikkun magazine, furthers the misunderstanding. After the obligatory tributes to Hitchens’s “high-toned English accent” and “mellifluous” voice (which apparently trick all those gullible fools not as smart as Silverstein), he takes issue with Hitchens’s contention that, “Islam, by the way, does not mean ‘peace.’ It means ’surrender,’ ‘prostration.’”

[chris haney]

I do not agree with his views on religion but regarding his views on Islamic Jihadism he is right on!

[twigs]

My Christian book club is reading his most recent book. I’m looking forward to reading it, knowing that I will not agree with it. But I admire his ability to say what he really thinks and to think clearly about a lot of issues. He was one of the few liberals who early on saw the Clintons for who they are.

[ozzymandus]

“Jewcy”???