Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Musharraf rejects US strikes in Pakistan
AP on Yahoo ^ | 8/7/07 | Rohan Sullivan - ap

Posted on 08/07/2007 11:25:52 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - President Gen. Pervez Musharraf said Tuesday that talk of U.S. military strikes against al-Qaida in Pakistan only hurts the fight against terrorism, and his troops bombarded militant hideouts in their strongest response yet to a month of anti-government attacks. Ten suspected militants were killed.

The assault by artillery and helicopter gunships "knocked out" two compounds in Daygan village in the tribal belt near the border with Afghanistan that were being used as staging posts for attacks on security forces, said Maj. Gen. Waheed Arshad, the army's top spokesman.

Ten militants were killed and at least seven were wounded in the operation, about 10 miles west of Miran Shah, the main town in the North Waziristan region, he said.

No ground troops were used in the operation, and the report on militant casualties was based on information from "local sources," he said without elaborating.

There were at least four smaller-scale bombings and shootings in the border region Tuesday, the latest in almost daily violence that has intensified pressure on Musharraf to crack down on militants in the area.

Musharraf, a key ally in Washington's war against terrorism, told visiting Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., that comments by senior U.S. officials and presidential hopefuls about the possibility of unilateral U.S. strikes within the country were not helpful. Musharraf met Durbin in the southern city of Karachi.

"He emphasized that only Pakistan's security forces, which were fully capable of dealing with any situation, would take counterterrorism action inside Pakistani territory," the Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

"The president pointed out that certain recent U.S. statements were counterproductive to the close cooperation and coordination between the two countries in combating the threat of terrorism," the ministry said.

President Bush said Monday that America and Pakistan, if armed with good intelligence, could track and kill al-Qaida leaders in Pakistan. He stopped short of saying whether he would ask Musharraf before dispatching U.S. troops to the country.

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., a presidential candidate, has said that he would use military force in Pakistan if necessary to root out terrorists, prompting angry responses from Pakistani officials.

Musharraf also described a new law tying U.S. aid to Pakistan to progress in combatting militants as an "irritant in the bilateral relationship," the statement said.

His comments came two days before he is due to hold talks with Afghan President Hamid Karzai about border security at a tribal council, or jirga, in Afghanistan.

Arshad said U.S.-made Cobra helicopter gunships and artillery attacked the compounds in North Waziristan about 5 a.m. after receiving intelligence that militants were there. Militants fired back with light and heavy weapons. The clash lasted about four hours, he said.

"The militants used to regroup and prepare attacks on security forces and take refuge at these compounds, so security forces targeted them," Arshad told Dawn television.

A local security official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of his job, said a stray mortar round had hit a home in Miran Shah, injuring three or four people.

The Daygan assault appeared to be the toughest military action since troops withdrawn from the tribal zone in September 2006 began to redeploy there in July, following the collapse of a controversial peace deal with pro-Taliban militants.

Since then, attacks on government forces have risen, and more than 360 people have been killed, including at least 102 in the army's raid last month of the radical Red Mosque in Islamabad. Militants have vowed to avenge those deaths.

Elsewhere along the border Tuesday, a soldier was killed in a drive-by attack on security forces by two men on a motorcycle in North West Frontier Province, according to police official Israr Khan. Another soldier was killed in North Waziristan by a bomb that exploded near him as he fetched water from a stream, a security official said.

In Bannu, a city near North Waziristan, a bomb exploded Tuesday evening close to a police station, injuring five civilians but no police, said Amir Maqbool Shah, a Bannu police officer.

___

Associated Press Writers Bashirullah Khan in Miran Shah and Riaz Khan in Peshawar contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airstrikes; alqaedapakistan; musharraf; pakistan; rejects; strikes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 08/07/2007 11:25:54 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I’d vote for Mushariff as POTUS before I’d vote for Obama.


2 posted on 08/07/2007 11:27:55 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Now that Pakistan has confirmed that OBL is in their country I will know where to send a postcard. Hopefully, GWB will soon sent OBL postcard attached to a missile somewhere in Pakistan.


3 posted on 08/07/2007 11:29:49 AM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

AHHAHAHAAHAHAHA...aint that the truth! Mushariff has escaped death more times than evil kenevil!


4 posted on 08/07/2007 11:34:07 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

WOW! I can’t wait for the MSM to expose Obama’s total stupidity in suggesting that we invade an ally!


5 posted on 08/07/2007 11:34:58 AM PDT by Saint Louis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Obama has already changed his stance seven times since he threatened to attack our ally. Musharraf has no chance to keep up with a person of that nimbleness of mind.


6 posted on 08/07/2007 11:35:52 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: in hoc signo vinces

apparently not as pro-terrorist as Hussein Obama.


7 posted on 08/07/2007 11:35:56 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I’d vote for Mushariff as POTUS before I’d vote for Obama.

You'd vote for a military dictator who deposed an elected leader and has spent much of his career in the Pakistani military forming and aiding Muslim terrorist groups for deployment in Afghanistan and Kashmir? Seriously?
8 posted on 08/07/2007 11:38:31 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Saint Louis
Don't hold your breath over the MsM. Just give Obama some ice cream and send him off with the rest of the kids in the race.

..

Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., walks and eats an ice cream cone during a stop at the Ice Cream Capital of the World Visitors Center, Monday, Aug. 6, 2007, in Le Mars, Iowa. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)

9 posted on 08/07/2007 11:41:12 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Welcome to FR. The Virtual Boot Camp for 'infidels' in waiting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Over Obama, sure. He’s more pro-american.


10 posted on 08/07/2007 11:42:27 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pissant

pissant, I HATE Obama but must point out that your comparison is not valid. Musharaff, despite his recent posturing in the face of a threatened American strike in Waziristan is no benevolent ally. Don’t forget - this man was was of the major actors behind the creation and arming of Taliban and Al Queda prior to 9/11.


11 posted on 08/07/2007 11:49:17 AM PDT by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Perhaps, but other than the US, Mushariff has killed more terorists in the last 5 years than anyone else. Depsite being a dictator, a shady past and being only an ally of convenience, he still is both smarter and more capable than Obama ever will be.


12 posted on 08/07/2007 11:52:48 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Over Obama, sure. He’s more pro-american.

The Pakistani military formed the Taliban and gave it to Afghanistan and the world. The Pakistani military, through A.Q. Khan, distributed key nuclear technologies to Iran and North Korea, presenting the US with the problem it now faces in those countries. Musharraf was the leader of that military for much of that time, and he is now a half-hearted ally who has ceded vast portions of his country to al-Qaeda and tribal groups which support al-Qaeda. He refuses to allow the US to enter his territory to flush out al-Qaeda and he refuses to do so himself, despite the billions we give him. The notion that any American would consider him more worthy of the US presidency than any Republican or Democratic candidate is bizarre.
13 posted on 08/07/2007 11:58:45 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

It might be bizarre. But it is not a statement on Mushariff’s odious past, it’s a statement on Obama’s odious present and stupidity.

I’d also vote for any random cowpie over Obama.


14 posted on 08/07/2007 12:06:04 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

"talk of U.S. military strikes against al-Qaida in Pakistan only hurts the fight against terrorism"

Now that part, is easy enough to have an instinctual understanding of...
Whatsamatta with Obama and the liberal Dems who keep mouthing this "we should have attacked Pakistan, or Saudi Arabia, or ANYWHERE but Saddam's Iraq"???

The really want us out of the frying pan, and into the fire? Not only us, but many million others, too?

I guess the answer is, they don't care. They will say (with twisted words) anything that can be used to second guess and attack the present administration. Regardless of cost...

The Dems keep pushing me into becoming even more of a hard-core Republican supporter. Obama, at this point, is so bad, even HillaryTM makes more sense than this big-eared big mouth, Barrack Hussein Obama.

15 posted on 08/07/2007 12:37:16 PM PDT by BlueDragon (looking at the Dems, I can't help but thinking, "I'm surrounded by <strike>idiots!</strike>fools!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

You guys and gals know Musharref is not our friend, right??? He’s only with us because he knows what we will do if he strays a bit farther off course...

And we are trying our best to not allow him to do that...

Now that he knows he has to show some effort...There will be (and we have already seen on another FR thread here today) stepped up efforts to drive the press away from them being in the spotlight too much with Obama’s comments and other flagilations...

I for one will always be skeptical of anything being reported on about these “efforts”...

We cannot afford to let our guard down one bit...

Eventually unless OBL’s head is on a stick, Mr. M over there knows it is only a matter of time (if he doesn’t get it done) that we’ll be over in there beating the bushes...

And its going to happen before the big election...Or it will never happen...

If a two term president cannot muster the rest of those goobers together in D.C. to give the War on Terror the tools and parameters to get it done in 8 years???

It ain’t going to get done...

The nambies will win again...

All because we only tried to get it done...


16 posted on 08/07/2007 1:45:28 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

These statements are all for local comsumpstion.....we have the green light I will bet.


17 posted on 08/07/2007 2:06:22 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog

We have folks with them, I would bet.


18 posted on 08/07/2007 2:09:04 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Yep.


19 posted on 08/07/2007 2:09:29 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pissant

We get a whiff of OBL or Ayman are... its go time. I think that decision has been made.


20 posted on 08/07/2007 2:10:50 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson