Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House enforces strict dress code for tourists
CBS News ^ | 7/26/07

Posted on 07/29/2007 10:50:10 AM PDT by Santa Fe_Conservative

WASHINGTON New signs are posted around the White House indicating a new strict enforcement of the dress code, the Washington Post reported Thursday. The code applies to all visitors and staff members, including tourists.

Some tourists are finding the strict clothing restrictions at the White House un-American.

The forbidden items include jeans, sneakers, mini-skirts, t-shirts, tank tops and absolutely no flip flops.

The motivation for the clothing crack-down comes from the Bush Administration who think some of those who work there and those who visit just don't dress appropriately.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: dresscode; govwatch; tourism; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-280 next last
To: Eaker

I work at a law firm where jeans are NEVER allowed. I’m glad that you can wear them to your workplace, and I wear them periodically as well. But, the WH asked for no jeans. So, this is what you do, just like what I did for my husband. A lightweight pair of pants with a lightweight short-sleeve summer shirt or polo. It’s not that difficult. I guarantee you that my husband was more comfortable and cooler than if he was in jeans at 104 degrees.


141 posted on 07/29/2007 1:06:10 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester
If it’s on CBS then it’s GOTTA be true!

This has been Lucy Ramirez, reporting. Back to you, Dan.


142 posted on 07/29/2007 1:09:11 PM PDT by gunservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
These rules would have denied my little girls, in their patriotic sundresses, the thrill of seeing the White House:

Image Hosting by PictureTrail.com

143 posted on 07/29/2007 1:12:49 PM PDT by Politicalmom (A sovereign nation loses that status if it cannot secure its own borders.-Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Major_Risktaker

>Class has nothing to do with it.<

Class has everything to do with it!

The Dalai Lama reflects his own culture. There seems to be a sad lacking of class in reflecting ours these days.
Perhaps that means our culture is no longer classy!

I repeat that how a people present themselves tells a great deal about that people, their thinking habits AND their standards.


144 posted on 07/29/2007 1:12:49 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

No, it wouldn’t have. Your girls look absolutely beautiful! You’re very lucky. They would have definitely been admitted entrance into the WH. :-)


145 posted on 07/29/2007 1:14:59 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

>These rules would have denied my little girls, in their patriotic sundresses, the thrill of seeing the White House.<

Oh no, they wouldn’t! Your little girls are appropriately dressed and absolutely adorable (provided they are wearing shoes, of course.) :)


146 posted on 07/29/2007 1:15:41 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
The WH is not a GD'ed Six Flags Over America (at least when the GOP is in office).

Apparently you don't watch C-Span...

147 posted on 07/29/2007 1:23:28 PM PDT by Iscool (OK, I'm Back...Now what were your other two wishes???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Lord_Baltar
But, but, but, I thought the White House was the People’s House....

That would be the House of Representatives wing of the Capitol.

148 posted on 07/29/2007 1:29:39 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (To love and be wise exceeds men's might....... (I'm just lucky I guess))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

They were wearing white leather sandals that were comfortable to walk in. Without a back strap. They would have been denied.

Such sandals are worn with dresses to church regularly in hot weather in every church I have ever attended, but that wouldn’t be good enough according to these rules.

Banning disgusting displays I can understand. This I can’t.


149 posted on 07/29/2007 1:32:49 PM PDT by Politicalmom (A sovereign nation loses that status if it cannot secure its own borders.-Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: bluefish
It feels like a silly application here though. In your mind, is walking through the whitehouse nude ok? A bathing suit? Slippery slopes can go either direction from the apex!

Agree that slippery slopes go both ways; arguably, we've slipped in the other direction already: personally, I think too many Americans do dress like slobs and sluts. But what business is that of mine? I find that I get more respect when dressed nicely; that is incentive enough for me - free market mentality, no?

I think convenience store rules: no shoes, no shirt, no service - are adequate as a matter of safety. Beyond that, it's supposed to be a free country, most notably so in public buildings.
150 posted on 07/29/2007 1:34:22 PM PDT by FreedomFromGov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Major_Risktaker

Love it!


151 posted on 07/29/2007 1:36:08 PM PDT by bacterialalbatross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
Since when is the request to dress respectfully tyranny? ROTFCMEO! First, they came for my freedom to wear what I wanted in public buildings. Then, they came for my freedom to speak my mind in public buldings (Air Force One, anyone?). Then they came for my freedom to speak my mind anywhere in the country. Laugh, laugh, laugh.
152 posted on 07/29/2007 1:37:02 PM PDT by FreedomFromGov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Dear RINO_Lady,

You posted the following:
But, the WH asked for no jeans. So, this is what you do, just like what I did for my husband.

Please consider that we elected to occupy the WHite House is a public servant. We did not elect him to be the nation’s husband.

As I remember, the owners of property dress as they wish when visiting their property.

While I likely deplore the general coarsening of American society at least as much as you do, the image of a Texan banning jeans is laughable.

As for the White House not being some theme park, agreed. But that is only because the heirs to Louis Carroll have not sued over the White House becoming a bought and paid for Alice-In_Mexicoland show, thanks to Bush’s border debacle.

Yes, manners and dress have a place, but the Nanny State can’t dress the public. If their parents didn’t teach those basic social graces, and since th public is the ultimate power in America, I hold that the public can dress as they wish when visiting the White House.


153 posted on 07/29/2007 1:40:13 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFromGov

ROTFCMEO is not laughing, my friend. It is crying.


154 posted on 07/29/2007 1:40:41 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

I have class. I have sandals, cut-offs, T-shirt, sunglasses and a straw hat. Women are at their best when worked up and mad:) I seem to be good at that:)


155 posted on 07/29/2007 1:41:57 PM PDT by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: BobS

See #34 and #144.


156 posted on 07/29/2007 1:44:06 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
"The WH is a seat of power and can do just fine without frivolously dressed, camera toting tourists."

I guess all that tradition of the WH being "the people's house" is just so much claptrap anyway.

The audacity of some people to visit their house wearing what they want. What cheek. If they can't dress right let them eat cake.

157 posted on 07/29/2007 1:45:56 PM PDT by Proud_texan (Just my opinion, no relationship to reality is expressed or implied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bluefish

I pay for that House, therefore I should be able to visit in in flip-flops if I so chose.


158 posted on 07/29/2007 1:47:12 PM PDT by bacterialalbatross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

I’m just waiting for the first Soldier on mid-tour leave from Iraq to get kicked out of a White House tour by some zealous rules nanny because he was wearing jeans and sneakers.


159 posted on 07/29/2007 1:47:31 PM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFromGov

This is how it happens. First they tell us how to dress in the WH, then they tell us how to dress elsewhere.


This is actually a return to the previous dress code that had been in place before the previous administration turned the White House into a trailer park.

Now go out and buy some more foil. You missed a spot behind your left ear.


160 posted on 07/29/2007 1:48:27 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-280 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson