Posted on 07/26/2007 8:22:01 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
note: EVEN IF you have waived speedy trial, you can reactivate or recapture you speedy trial right by filing a demand for speedy after the fact.
In addition, it is proper to note, waiving speedy is not a open ended delay. The judge can not allow a case to continue infinitly and can and does use case managment procedures contained in the state procedural rules and the courts own local rules.
Go to Michelle Malkin’s document dump and read the files. They have victim testimony, two eye witnesses, and DNA evidence. After reading the file, come back and explain to me about why the victim, and witnesses and the DNA are lying. “Who ya gonna believe? Me, or your lying eyes?” We are not on the jury, so we are allowed to use our brains and draw rational conclusions. People like you and the ACLU are scary. Here’s an idea, why don’t you take him into your home and allow him to care for your little girls, unsupervised.
just asking.
ping
Obviously Judge Katherine Savage either is an active or closet pedophile, a sadist, or she was bribed/blackmailed.
"Go to Michelle Malkins document dump and read the files. They have victim testimony, two eye witnesses, and DNA evidence. After reading the file, come back and explain to me about why the victim, and witnesses and the DNA are lying. Who ya gonna believe? Me, or your lying eyes? We are not on the jury, so we are allowed to use our brains and draw rational conclusions. People like you and the ACLU are scary. Heres an idea, why dont you take him into your home and allow him to care for your little girls, unsupervised.
42 posted on 07/26/2007 9:57:43 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
You’re trying to throw out the Constitution in the name of ‘justice’. Instead, you need to concentrate on making the government operate within the confines of the Bill of Rights. I don’t care if the guy is guilty or not - he has rights.
Give it up, flyweight. Your limited insight qualifies you for membership on a web site for college kids...
Is it the prosecutor’s responsibility to arrange and provide for an interpretor, or is that the Court’s responsibility?
The prosecutor in this case says it’s the Court’s responsibility, not his. He is appealing the ruling.
The sixth amendment doesn't have conditions attached to it: "unless the prosecutor screws up, unless the judge screws up, etc..."
Perhaps the judge, prosecutor or both need to dealt with, but in any case, his speedy trial rights have been infringed unless he was the sole cause of the delay. I don't get why this is so hard to understand.
Your reply says it all...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.