Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A STATEMENT FROM SCOTT THOMAS BEAUCHAMP: (TNR's diarist comes clean)
The New Republic ^ | 7/26/07 | Scott Thomas Beauchamp

Posted on 07/26/2007 4:26:20 AM PDT by TomB

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-179 next last
To: TomB

Non-newsy BTTT.


61 posted on 07/26/2007 10:49:59 AM PDT by TomB ("The terrorist wraps himself in the world's grievances to cloak his true motives." - S. Rushdie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Here’s betting that Michael Moore will feature him in an upcoming crockumentary and Cindy Sheehan will use him to campaign against Nancy Pelosi. Maybe Professor Ward Chuchill needs a grad assistant at whatever loony-left college he lands at!


62 posted on 07/26/2007 11:39:26 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TomB
It's come out over at Ace of Spades blog and others that this tool is married to an TNR employee by the name of Elspeth Reeve.

This jerk got this gig just like Joe Wilson did.

63 posted on 07/26/2007 12:55:30 PM PDT by AngryJawa ({IDPA, NRA} GO HUNTER '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomB
From Michelle's Malkin's link to Ace of Spades Blog:

July 26, 2007

Source: TNR Is A Lot More Worried Than They're Letting On; Scott Thomas Got His Job For Plame-ish Reasons: "Frankln Foer Doesn't Want To Tell TNR Staffer Elspeth Reeve Her Husband Is A Liar"

Reorganized, Re-edited, Corrected Post. The actual quote was "Frank doesn't want to tell ___ her husband is a liar," offered up not by my source but by someone else. The blank has now been confirmed as TNR staffer Elspeth Reeve, and even though the quote was "husband," there's some question about that: Via the weddingchannel.coml says their wedding is coming in October. Though perhaps they had a quickie civil ceremony before his last deployment or something, with the ceremony to occur later.

Look, husband/fiancee, not sure it matters. It certainly seems that everyone in the TNR offices were under the impression they'd already been married.

I was going to let this slide and not report it but then TNR played the hard guys and fired the guy actually sharing information about this with people. Meanwhile Foer and Beuchamp are still drawing paychecks.

Needless to say, Elspeth Reeve has nothing in particular to do with this, other than, I guess, some guy who walked by in the hallway suggesting her husband for the Niger Iraq mission. Gracie's pretty firm on her innocence, and, even if he weren't, this was Foer's call, not hers.

Scott Thomas Beauchamp was not chosen for this job because he had some terrific amount of experience or credentials or integrity. He was picked for Plame-type reasons: He's married or engaged to someone at TNR.

As Gracie reported to me, this is openly discussed in the TNR offices. One representative quote: "Frank[lin Foer] doesn't want to call [woman's] husband a liar." That wasn't Gracie saying that, that was someone else in the office, explaining the inter-office politics of this.

Gracie: Okay: Although I'm 100% certain that the husband of a staff member is central to this, I'm only about 90% certain that the husband IS Scott Thomas -- the alternative possibility is that the husband is one of the soldiers vouching for Scott Thomas

me: okay. well I was going to stay off of that anyway. I was more asking about: 1) The fact it's an open secret in the office 2:30 AM 2) your opinion that "Scott Thomas" was chosen for poor reasons, having to do with personal familiarity, rather than obvious journalistic credentials 3) that it's your opinion foer is the real screw-up here.

Note: I'm including that to prove I wasn't super-eager to mention that Beauchamp only got the job through his engagement to a staffer. I was going to say merely that he got the job due more to personal familiarity and connections than any obvious qualifications.

I was going to hold off on that. Until they pissed me off.

It's all so Plame-ish. As Gracie wrote to me, of all the embeds and milbloggers and real journalists they could have picked for the job, they instead chose to go with a very partisan, very inexperienced blogger just out of "laziness." Just because they knew him. Just because it was easy.

I actually think part of the reason was that they knew Beauchamp's politics -- he having put them on display on his goofy blog -- and so, just like with Valerie Plame, they knew the report was going to come back the way they wanted it when they sent him. But Gracie says it's just Occam's razor: Laziness.

Still, he's just speculating on the reason (as am I).

BTW, I have long kinda-sorta wanted to embed in Iraq... if TNR wants to sponsor me, I am more than willing to do some light petting with Michelle Cottle, if need be.

Thanks to Libberlocky for nailing down confirmation of the marriage/engagement angle. I was up half the night googling that.

I really want to stress that I wasn't particularly psyched about reporting this part of the story. But honestly, the name's already out there anyway; I'm just the first to run with it. There would have been someone right behind me.

Plus, like I said, I think TNR is playing very dirty pool here.

Allah's Always Gotta Be A Dick Update: Allah is questioning whether my suggested timeline is right -- that Elspeth got Beauchamp the gig because they were engaged/married. Instead, he wonders: Did Beauchamp already get the gig, and then had a whirlwind courtship with Elspeth?

All I can say is that this would have had to have been a very quick courtship. The guy starts posting for TNR a couple of months ago and then he's married or engaged to a woman he couldn't possibly have met more than once or twice, owing to his overseas deployment?

Further, my information tells me they went to the same college together.

... Fired: I knew this, but wasn't sure if I was supposed to say anything about it.

TNR fired Gracie at 7:25 this morning with the non-explanation, "Your services are no longer required." This information is offered up by one of Gracie's psuedonyms ("near certainty" on that) at discarded lies.

More at (http://ace.mu.nu/archives/234925.php)

64 posted on 07/26/2007 12:57:22 PM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa

Call Patrick Fitzgerald to investing the outing of Elspeth Reeve!
Political intimidation!


65 posted on 07/26/2007 12:57:35 PM PDT by counterpunch ("The Democrats are the party of slavery." - Cindy Sheehan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
Hey there.

Are you still in the sandbox?

Bet this Scott guy is a piece of work. Must be real popular with his buddies.......

66 posted on 07/26/2007 1:12:50 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TomB

His name may be “Scott Thomas”, but he most certainly is a “John Thomas”.


67 posted on 07/26/2007 1:12:56 PM PDT by Ignatz (Soylent Green are people, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues

What royally pisses me off is he is so defensive. He’s like how DARE these armchair generals at home QUESTION me? Then he blames the right wing blogosphere for his “troubles”. Hey jerk, if you lied about this then you should be completely disemboweled, and the leftwing press needs to go down hard. If you are telling the truth, then you’re an even bigger POS. What kind of dirtbag makes fun of a disfigured soldier? Why would he NOT report a mass grave of children, let alone turn in a cretin who thinks it’s funny to play with a childs skull? I understand gallows humor, and I know war is hell and we see crazy $hit, but no one thinks dead kids are funny. Ever.


68 posted on 07/26/2007 1:24:30 PM PDT by boop (Trunk Monkey. Is there anything he can't do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Are you still in the sandbox?

Hi! Yep, I'm still here and it is HOT outside these days. ;-)

Bet this Scott guy is a piece of work. Must be real popular with his buddies.......

He's full of B.S. And as I read more, I see that he appears to have quite the liberal agenda.

I love that he is BUSTED.

69 posted on 07/26/2007 1:49:24 PM PDT by Allegra (22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Yah, doesn’t like Republicans — from his blog —
FRIDAY, JUNE 09, 2006

. . .

I miss political arguments. There seems to be a consensus with all the boys overseas...we laugh harder at CSPAN than comedy central. Silly republicans.
posted by Scott Thomas at 4:13 AM 1 COMMENTS


70 posted on 07/26/2007 1:58:42 PM PDT by Greg F (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TomB

BUMP for later read...


71 posted on 07/26/2007 2:02:59 PM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy (Can I cast the second stone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
"In English libel law, Private Beauchamp would be regarded as a man with no character left to defend."

In the view of any decent human being, anywhere, Beau-chump "would be regarded as a man with no character left to defend."
72 posted on 07/26/2007 2:22:51 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Austin1
"...in order to play some role in an ideological battle that I never wanted to join.”

Nice try, dude, you joined in a vicious "ideological battle" when you published anonymous leftist hit-pieces in TNR. You're just sorry that you could not get away with your garbage so easily.....
73 posted on 07/26/2007 2:24:37 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TomB
Thus far we've found nothing to disprove the facts in the article;

Now, where have I heard that line before?

Oh, yeah, from CBS with the Bush National Guard story.

-PJ

74 posted on 07/26/2007 2:24:57 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

As usual, the SCUM of the left hate any “whistleblower” who might be inconvenient to them. They worship leftist so-called whistleblowers who are (so often) merely rabid socialist hacks, but let a real whistleblower get onto their wrongdoings and all interest in “whistleblower protection” goes right out the window.


75 posted on 07/26/2007 2:32:08 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Valin

It’s obvious from a moment’s perusal of his blog comments that we have here a vicious, dishonest leftist wanker, of the Noam Chomsky acolyte variety.

Fighting only for the “riches of empire” — ah, yes, this guy is truly an honest, objective source on the happenings in Iraq........


76 posted on 07/26/2007 2:39:08 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

“Gracie” is now a ticking time bomb. TNR had better come clean and soon.

Malkin, Mudville, and the blogosphere are just amazing. Hats off.


77 posted on 07/26/2007 2:43:00 PM PDT by IslandJeff (Jeremiah 2:14-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: TomB
He list himself as a PFC on this blog but is now a Private? http://ghostsonfilm.blogspot.com/
78 posted on 07/26/2007 2:43:13 PM PDT by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Speaks to motive: looks like he got demoted at some point, which, of course, likely just adds fuel to his literary fire.

[As a writer, he’s terrible: overwrought and self-centered. A typical lefty]


79 posted on 07/26/2007 2:45:53 PM PDT by IslandJeff (Jeremiah 2:14-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: IslandJeff
He’s not getting very good reviews from people posting on his blog either.
80 posted on 07/26/2007 2:49:25 PM PDT by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson