Posted on 07/12/2007 6:27:43 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
Huh? Where are the Christians strapping bombs on their bodies and blowing up buildings? Did you get that idea from Micheal Moore?
Gengis Khammunist is an Indian socialist who is for offshoring as many jobs from America as possible. He is working in America and loving the American dollar, but he loathes America, America’s history, and especially Christians, who he has compared to the Nazis in flame wars I’ve had with him.
Oh, and anyone who disagrees with him is a “commie bum.”
You know how collectivists and anti-Americans just love to project (accuse others of what they are and do).
Good tag line. It does look that way, doesn't it?
Check post #15.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/677734/posts
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/758342.stm
I understand a lot of people here go into instant denial mode when they read this. The standard response from most people here is to reject it outright calling it BS, to disown them as “Christian” or to blame the Indian government as the culprit responsible for suppressing Christian. Thats not likely to work, you gotta confront the reality.
Many would characterize Jim Jones (Jonestown in Guyana), Lord’s Resistance Army in Uganda and Savonarola as Christian fanatics.
The Nepal Defence Army is the Hindi variant.
Sorry, Hindi =>Hindu
Excuse me but I am not into “offshoring”. Not even anywhere close to that business but I have a good idea why its a matter of concern for YOU. You just cannot accept the presence of Indians in the job market. Sorry thats your problem not mine.
“but he loathes America, America’s history, and especially Christians, who he has compared to the Nazis....”
Just another of your lies.
“Oh, and anyone who disagrees with him is a “commie bum.””
Not just “anyone”. I reserve that tag only for YOU.
“You know how collectivists and anti-Americans just love to project (accuse others of what they are and do).”
I am neither “collectivists” nor “anti-Americans”. So don't know what you are talking about.
check post #26.
I take it you at least tried your best to come up with a creative response.
Pretty quick with that, weren’t ya? ;)
So, you think the existence of the NFLT justifies terrorist attacks by Hindutva extremists on Christians throughout the rest of India?
IIRC, you’ve more or less answered that question to the affirmative before, which means you are insane, and probably need to be on a watch list yourself.
Same goes for them. That’s the difference. Your buddy CarrotAndStick thinks terrorism is fine, as long as its Hindus committing the violence. I don’t think terrorism is fine - period.
No. But wouldn't you want to continue with the bombastic attitude you were displaying on here earlier, with the NLFT types too?
"Hang 'em both!"
Yeah right. Lol. Yawn.
Their tactic so far has been anything but “Al-Qaeda like” if we should go by what the same article says about the group.....
“Parivartan told the weekly that his party didn’t want bloodshed. “The bombs we threw at the Maoist office were intended as a warning and not to kill,” he said. “I stopped plans to assassinate Maoist chief Prachanda and Maoist minister Dev Gurung.”
I choose to draw a distinction here. If they are targeting civilians then most definitely I don't support them. Goes without saying. If they are using “suicide-bombing tactics” (that does not include women or children) against terrorist groups then I have a hard time seeing anything wrong with that.
Now you tell me why is it wrong to fight terrorists even if the device employed is suicide bombing. I will accept your stand and correct myself if there is sufficient reasoning in your reply.
Do you stuff words into others' mouths for a living?
Their (Nepal defence Army) ideology maybe hard lined Hindu but I haven't come across anywhere that the above particular Hindu group plans to kill innocent Christians or for that matter even Muslims. Their targets seems to be other terrorist groups especially the Maoists variety (and maybe other terror groups NLFT that infiltrate into Nepal).
I don't want to repeat myself so please now check post #38 and tell me if its wrong to use violence (whatever tactics) as a means to resist terrorism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.