Posted on 07/07/2007 9:42:07 AM PDT by HAL9000
so what is the solution?
__
Here is my “solution” posted on another thread which would have most likely elimanted most of the mess in Iraq and elsewhere:
Under President Bob Mecca would have been a pile of glass approximately 9/18/2001.
But what about the “outrage” the “overreaction”, the “backlash”.
President Bob would calmly explain that any anger at America is misdirected, the reason Mecca no longer exists is because of Islamic Fundamentalists. The destruction of Mecca is proof positive that terrorism is not what Allah wants, Islamic radicals caused the destruction of Mecca, as well as those other couple of thousand mosques we destroyed on 9/18.
Just as 9/11 was a wake-up call for America 9/18 was the wake up call for Muslims, if you would like to embrace a radical, stone age interpretation of your religion we will accomadate you on the stone age part of the equation. Hopefully 9/18 is the cold slap of reality on the face of followers of Islam that allah and Islam are not destined to control the world.
Any further terrorist attacks in the name of Islam will result in more massive deaths in the Muslim community and thousands of more mosques and communities turned into rubble until the lunacy of the radicals is brought under control.
It is now incumbent for the followers of Islam to get their house in order as America will no longer tolerate them like the parent of a spoiled child. We have ourselves to blame for tolerating this bad behaviour for so long, the warning signs were there, the threats were made, many were killed. Our non-reaction to many of these events gave radicals a feeling that they were invincible, they were on the right side of the argument, their God was going to rule the day.
That all ended on 9/18/2001, America accepts no blame for her reaction and for the deaths of 5 million muslims on 9/18, that blame lies with the muslim community. We are sorry that there were some innocents lost in the 5 million, this is a casualty of war, on 9/11 100% of the victims were innocent by design. You don’t tug on Superman’s cape.
This is President Bob saying God Bless You and God Bless America!!
Ala must be pleased.
Sycophants they are.
And strategically Libya is now out of the terrorism business.
Good point fortheDeclaration.
the US should arm all of the relatives of the massacred village and let the iraqis take revenge and kill all the al-queda terrorists!!!!
The US troops can just watch from the sidelines!!!!
The Iraqis are armed, abundantly so.
The Occult Of Islam, in its true colors again.
“Everytime a suicide bomb goes off, Iran should be hit hard.”
I am pretty sure the Iranians didn’t bomb this Shiite town. In any event, it’s not the suicide bombers who are said to be of Iranian origin, it’s the IEDs (or their design).
You can read between the lines here and notice that the filth has been chased out of large cities. They’re resorting to attacking tiny villages now.
Things are starting to settle down... over 7-8 days stories af new republicans loosing support, and the democrat party gearing up for another round of ‘we must surrender now’.
Seems like that template was just BEGGING for a little help from the media and democrat allies in Iraq, in the form of a big ‘spectacular’ with lots of innocent death for them to report.
“bumper-sticker” bump
That is exactly what Israel did with the Palestinian terrorists..........Israel has hit back hard over the past 60 years.....in fact, for every israeli death, israel has inflicted three times that in palestinian deaths
...and the result of the Israeli iron fisted policy ..... is Hamas , a radical terrorist group which has taken over Gaza
An “eye for an eye” policy, especially without any real humanitarian, economic and a comprehensive peace plan would result in the further radicalization of a captive population
If we hit Iran hard, we can expect the same results that Gaza has seen as result of 60 years of an “eye for an eye” policy..........the liberal progressive movements in Iran would be set back
You are talking as if muslims have control over what Al-Qaida does.
When Timothy McVeigh in 1995 bombed the OKC government building knowing fully well a child day care was in the building, did the larger American population have any control over Timothy’s actions ? off course not other than trying not to create more Timothy McVeighs by not have having another ruby ridge or waco incidence.
Bombing Mecca would only strengthen Al-Qaeda and Al-Qaeda does not care how many muslims you might want to kill, because according to Al-Qaeda , all muslims killed will go to “heaven”, so Al-Qaeda is not going to be worrying about how many muslims we kill.......
..it will only encourage them to keep the jihad going even if all muslims die.......
...the result of which is many more thousands of Americans will die in the process due to Al-Qaeda being able to recruit many more radicalized muslims
..I am sure you do not want to see thousands more Americans dying
Yes, the US bombed Libya in 1986 and in retaliation, Libya was involved in the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 in 1991, that killed all aboard.
In 2004, after 18 years, Libya finally made peace with the West after almost two decades
So if you are willing to go through almost two decades of war with Iran which will cost us a tremendous number of lives lost and trillions of dollars for the war and reconstruction, than your plan will work
Obviously I disagree with your theory and think my theory is the one that would have and will save more American lives in the long run, I’m sure you do not want to see thousands of more Americans dying :)))
I will repeat what I wrote to you in a email.
We are at war with Iran and they are responsible for killing our troops.
Whatever it takes to defeat Islamic facism is worth the price-there is no other option.
We need to defeat Iran before it develops nukes, just as we had to go into Iraq.
War is a costly business, but freedom is never cheap.
The problem that Israel had with Palestinian terrorists has been its own Labor party that has sought to compromise with them.
As for the liberal progressive movement in Iran, they have had 30 years to do something and they haven't.
Maybe they need us to sweep away the Islamic military before they can take over.
I am pretty sure the Iranians didn’t bomb this Shiite town. In any event, it’s not the suicide bombers who are said to be of Iranian origin, it’s the IEDs (or their design).
Yes, those are sophisicated IEDs that are killing our troops.
Bush stated that anyone who sided with the terrorists was going to be considered an enemy, that is why we went after the Taliban.
Now, we are suppose to stop at the leading exporter of terrorism in the world, Iran, when they are supplying the weapons against out troops?
I could see Bush waiting for hard evidence to prove it, but once he has that evidence, he should strike Iran and make it clear that they will pay a price for killing U.S. troops.
Can you point to one instance where the palestinian terrorists had killed israelis and the Israelis have not done anything ? Israel has always hit back hard, but if you can point to any instance when Israel did not do anything, i would like to know, thanks
The fact that the Ayatollahs in Iran have been clamping down on the liberals, shows that the Liberals are making some progress in Iran
Yes, if you can sweep away the iranian military without collateral deaths among women and kids, than you would probably strengthen the Liberal movement in Iran
The fact that the Israelis' do 'something' is meaningless.
The last war they just recently fought is a case in point.
No earlier Israeli Government (1948-90) would have stopped short of anything less then totally crushing the terrorists after they kidnapped those Israeli soldiers.
Clinton 'did something' after the terror attacks in the 90's, but it was always short of doing anything effective.
The fact that the Ayatollahs in Iran have been clamping down on the liberals, shows that the Liberals are making some progress in Iran
The Ayatollahs are always 'cracking' down on the 'liberals'.
When are the 'liberals' going to overthrow the despotic government that has been in control for over 30 years?
Yes, if you can sweep away the iranian military without collateral deaths among women and kids, than you would probably strengthen the Liberal movement in Iran
Well, someone's women and kids are going to die in this war, as in every war.
The only question you have to ask is, do you want them to be Iranian or American.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.