Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/01/2007 8:10:58 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SirLinksalot; perfect stranger

Is this the same author that wrote “No One Left To Lie To”?


2 posted on 07/01/2007 8:18:25 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Hitchens is terribly intolerant.


3 posted on 07/01/2007 8:20:29 AM PDT by Vision Thing (Z-Visa? Z-Visa? I don't need no stinkin' Z-Visa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Narcissim is never a pretty thing to see, Hitchens falls upon the idea that somehow Atheism demands morality, or even common decency of it’s adherents, and that is simply not true, Atheism fills mass graves and cemeteries faster then any other philosophy of mankind that has ever been created.

God is indeed Great, it is mankind that is not.


4 posted on 07/01/2007 8:21:34 AM PDT by padre35 (Quod autem isti dicunt non interponendi vos bello)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
“infinite value of every human life”

The Rabbi is spot on.

The difference between the atheist / communist world
and the Judeo Christan world.

Here is what sets most totalitarian from Democratic society’s apart.

The communists have no respect for human life.
The Islamists appear to have even less.

6 posted on 07/01/2007 8:30:16 AM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
"Prof. Bently Glass, who suggested that the notions of good and evil be completely divorced from their moral connotations and redefined as what is good or bad for the development of a species?"

How do you know what is "good or bad for the species" without a definition of good or bad yet? In any event, "what is good or bad for the development of the species" is ultimately a philosophical question, incapable of being quantified. This is a pretty poor attempt to define good and evil.

8 posted on 07/01/2007 8:31:24 AM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Arthur Allen Leff >> Hitchens.

Atheists never consider the ethical and moral implications of a godless world. God provides the moral center to the Universe (along with everything else ;) )


9 posted on 07/01/2007 8:31:52 AM PDT by tdewey10 (Can we please take out iran's nuclear capability before they start using it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Unfortunately Atheist, because they are biblically illiterate by definition, can not possibly understand the spiritual element which is required to know God.

In other words they're totally blinded by their own arrogant willful ignorance.

16 posted on 07/01/2007 8:52:41 AM PDT by sirchtruth (No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
When I saw the title of this article I thought I would find a response to Hitchens by Rabbi Danile Lapin or perhaps Rabbi 'Aryeh Spero. But Smuley Boteach??? I'm absolutely flabbergasted!

I've never been a big Shmuley Boteach fan. He's been "Michael Jackson's rabbi," has written a book on "kosher sex," and at one time attacked Fundamentalist Protestantism as having absolutely nothing in common while co-authoring a book with a "new age" personality on how much Judaism and the "new age" allegedly do have in common (in fairness, he later came to praise Fundamentalist Protestants for their defense of Biblical morality).

Boteach is a maverick, and I'm still not going to join his fan club (I suspect he's still going to come out of left field a lot). But I'll tell you this much: my opinion of him just when up a great deal!

For taking this stand, yeyasher kochakha, Shmuley Boteach!

21 posted on 07/01/2007 9:12:54 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator ("Pinchas ben-'El`azar ben-'Aharon HaKohen heshiv 'et-chamati me`al Benei-Yisra'el . . . ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

“When a Man stops believing in God he doesn’t then believe in nothing, he believes anything.” -G.K. Chesterton

“I Don’t Believe in Atheists.” -Chris Hedges


22 posted on 07/01/2007 9:20:06 AM PDT by batmast (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Olbermann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Hugh Hewitt recently hosted the Great God Debate between Hitchens and Mark D Roberts.

I was amazed that when science came up neither of them knew enough to be able to discuss it at any level.

That's a shame because this is where Hitchens' arguments break down.

Guillermo Gonzalez & Jay W Richards, The Privileged Planet

24 posted on 07/01/2007 9:45:26 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

I’m reading his book now. Finished the intro. and the first chapter. It’s very good so far, as good as his `Why Orwell Matters’.
But his photo in the back could be a lot better. He looks slightly demented, or maybe it’s just a `lazy eye’.


26 posted on 07/01/2007 10:14:12 AM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

bttt


32 posted on 07/01/2007 1:01:27 PM PDT by Christian4Bush ("Polls are for strippers and liberals." Caller to Rush, 6/5/2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

bookmark for later


36 posted on 07/01/2007 4:15:54 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
"..Whereas the Bible establishes the infinite value of every human life, healthy or diseased, no less an authority than Francis Crick, Nobel laureate and co-discoverer of DNA, suggested that babies should be considered alive only two days after birth, during which time they could be examined for defects. If defects were found that were sufficiently deleterious, the infant could presumably be eliminated with impunity because it had not yet become alive..."

This is horrific, but not much different from partial birth abortion. If one takes a purely logical and not spiritual and religious view of life a lot of people will need to die as a matter of convenience and efficiency and it does not take a Hitler to start the process.

38 posted on 07/01/2007 9:47:02 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

*Yawn* More logically fallacious “proofs” of Christianity’s superiority over “Evolutionism”. Let’s not forget that Christianity before Darwin held “Darwinistic” beliefs.


42 posted on 07/02/2007 12:07:55 PM PDT by TypeZoNegative (Trinidad&Tobago: Proof that a Muslim minority (5%pop) causes a majority of a country's problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson