Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/28/2007 7:58:03 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
To: LdSentinal

2 posted on 06/28/2007 8:01:23 PM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

One of the few areas where Dubya has done well during his presidency.


3 posted on 06/28/2007 8:01:56 PM PDT by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

A counterrevolution ? I wasn’t aware we had a revolution here to counter.

Commies.


4 posted on 06/28/2007 8:02:26 PM PDT by farlander (Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

Sounds like E.J. Dionne Jr is a little upset, poor little thing. Give him a pacifier and put him to bed.


5 posted on 06/28/2007 8:02:56 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
counterrevolution

Yes, that's exactly right: The original, bogus revolution starting in the late 1930's must be reversed. It was totally illegitimate, activist and Unconstitutional. And were I the Supreme Court, I'd make the reversal retroactive--and make liberals pay the full cost of their evil.

6 posted on 06/28/2007 8:03:36 PM PDT by sourcery (Global Warming: It's the Sun, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

Go ahead and whine, EJ. Fred Thompson is going to appoint 3 more Roberts/Alito clones. Then we can watch happily as the judicial tyranny of the left is squelched for more than a generation. The Founding Fathers will finally be able to stop rolling over in their graves.


7 posted on 06/28/2007 8:03:54 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (<---- is vacationing from gnats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

I wonder where Dipwad Dionne Jr. got the idea he can dictate how the government is run.


8 posted on 06/28/2007 8:04:03 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

How’s it feel? Like the shafting WE’VE been taking for 40 years? DEAL!!!


9 posted on 06/28/2007 8:04:47 PM PDT by ODC-GIRL (Proudly serving our Nation's Homeland Defense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
Liberals NEVER have litmus tests for judicial appointments, eh E.J? Its those nasty conservatives that must be stopped from loading the courts with ideological judges. Why, liberals are just impartial, rule of law-minded and have no ulterior agenda. Yeah, right!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

10 posted on 06/28/2007 8:04:50 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race," Roberts said.

How outrageous that a Supreme Court Justice could think like this!
/S

11 posted on 06/28/2007 8:09:08 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

I love it when liberals are steamed. It means something’s going right.


13 posted on 06/28/2007 8:10:00 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
Aw, Ol' Mushmouth got his panties in a bunch 'cuz The Supremes are starting to interpret the Constitution literally, and not reading into it like it was an 18th Century Usenet filled with the ramblings of colonial malcontents......waaaah.


14 posted on 06/28/2007 8:10:31 PM PDT by Viking2002 (Fred in '08. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

Truth be known, I’ll bet E.J. wipes his ass on a copy of the Constitution every morning.


16 posted on 06/28/2007 8:17:46 PM PDT by abigailsmybaby (I was born with nothing. So far I have most of it left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

He’s right. Not one more Roberts or Alito. Make it five more.


18 posted on 06/28/2007 8:20:10 PM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Now more popular than Congress!* *According to a new RasMESSen Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
Hey Democrats, in case you forgot... to the victor, go the spoils.

Now don't go away mad... just go away.

24 posted on 06/28/2007 8:25:23 PM PDT by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
I agree.

.

.

MAKE IT TWO MORE!!
25 posted on 06/28/2007 8:26:56 PM PDT by elizabetty (Perpetual Candidate using campaign donations for your salary - Its a good gig if you can get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

Ridiculous column.


26 posted on 06/28/2007 8:27:21 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
E.J. Dionne does a perfect Barney Frank impression.

Only it is not just an impression.

27 posted on 06/28/2007 8:27:46 PM PDT by OriginalIntent (Undo the ACLU revision of the Constitution. If you agree with the ACLU revisions, you are a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
As Norman Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute noted this week in Roll Call, the issue-ad decision demonstrated "not a careful, conservative deference to Congress" but instead "a willingness by Roberts to toss aside Congress' conclusions to fit his own ideological predispositions" -- the very definition of judicial activism.

Maybe conservatives are now able to see those profound meanings emanating from the Constitution's "penumbras" that heretofore were only detectable by liberals.

34 posted on 06/28/2007 8:40:32 PM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (NY Times: "fake but accurate")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal; jude24; P-Marlowe

At this point, I sort of agree with this article. Pres Bush is not going to get a conservative through this Senate. It isn’t going to happen.

He should recess appoint a conservative to serve to the end of the Bush term.

Then the election will determine who gets to make the next appointment. It would be a win/win for conservatives.

First, we know there’s no such thing as a political moderate. Moderate = liberal. Therefore, if we get a liberal from a liberal next President, there’s no difference.

However, if we happen to get a revised Senate and a conservative President, then there’s a ready-made seat on Scotus for them to fill.

JMHO.

Although, the President probably isn’t thrilled about being called a moron by his amnesty foes. I hope he doesn’t take the rhetoric about the amnesty debate personally. “It’s not personal, Sonny; it’s only business.”


37 posted on 06/28/2007 8:46:55 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson