Replies

I don't believe its too aggressive, maybe not enough. A large majority of the people are at wits end with the Hill Gang (I use "gang" literally).

Passive resistance has worked well for the Libs/Progressives/socialists, or whatever they call themselves now, so why not use against them.

I like the idea of electing Duncan Hunter type candidates for our leaders. I would vote for Duncan.

We have to do it all to beat them now.

.02 worth

"Passive resistance has worked well for the Libs/Progressives/socialists, or whatever they call themselves now, so why not use against them."

That's the point of this article. "Passive resistance" is a better word than my "civil disobediance" terminology.

Mine, and apparently, your point is to move beyond the loaded political system.

The liberals have used "passive resistance" (more like...agressive resistance) for decades. They used it to lose the Viet Nam war, even after the Tet Offensive that we won decisively; they've used it to install liberal idiologies in our schools and other institutions; they've used it to fight against the WOT. They've used "passive" disobedience today to change the thinking of mainstream America regarding Iraq and other conservative issues.

Is it not time for us to use the same techniques...the same "passive resistance" to restore our Constitutional Republic? I'm willing - are you?