Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drzz

Let’s see. I have 650 men. The enemy has 1,500 (although Custer may not have known this).

My plan to deal with being outnumbered more than 2/1 is to split my men into three roughly equal-sized groups, inviting defeat in detail.

Sounds like an excellent plan to me.


47 posted on 06/25/2007 7:32:45 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Diversity in theory is the enemy of diversity in practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

Front and flank attack, movement, offensive, surprise.

That’s the way to attack a force in the cavalry, and that’s what Custer did. As US general in chief Nelson Miles and Confederate cavalry general Rosser said, the plan was good.

The front columns didn’t do their job, and the flank column, with Custer, was left alone.


50 posted on 06/25/2007 7:38:37 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

Chancellorsville, Brice’s Crossroads.


61 posted on 06/25/2007 7:49:50 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
Custer was going after the Indian village. The Indian Warriors were defending their wifes and children. Custer was "famous" for attacking undefended villages.

He went to the well once too often. And, he divided his force, had subordinates whom he mistreated and still expected to be loyal to him.

Custer was a fool, and good men died for his foolishness.

85 posted on 06/25/2007 8:47:10 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("All gave some, and some gave all!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson