Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

I’m not too familiar with fertility treatments and such, but my first thought was; How many of these men were conceived using a fertility treatment due to the fact that their fathers had a low sperm count. I don’t think this is a fair “study” as there are many variables they didn’t account for...


15 posted on 06/19/2007 10:32:47 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (Liberty Rocks Blog: http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: LibertyRocks

“How many of these men were conceived using a fertility treatment due to the fact that their fathers had a low sperm count.”

50% -— saw it elsewhere. And actually it was “low” it was typically immotal or immeasureable.

The study means bumptkis.


19 posted on 06/27/2007 4:21:43 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson