Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moonbats seek to ban Blue Angels from San Fran
Hot Air ^ | May 7, 2007 | BRYAN

Posted on 06/07/2007 9:05:48 PM PDT by Lady J USA 1981

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: A.A. Cunningham

They need to put some live ordinance on that wingtip mount, then go out and take out those Code Pink commies.


61 posted on 06/08/2007 11:58:43 AM PDT by NCC-1701 (ELIMINATE ORGANIZED CRIME. ABOLISH THE I.R.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jabbermog
Navy carrier pilots spend an extra ordinary amount practicing carrier landing and take offs. As a former crew member I'm glad they do.
62 posted on 06/08/2007 12:50:29 PM PDT by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 04-Bravo

What the Blue Angels ought to do is (if possible) go supersonic, do a low pass downtown, and let that sonic boom knock a few free-clinic-provided fillings loose!


63 posted on 06/09/2007 6:07:51 AM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

A sonic boom from a group of F-18’s would probably make the hippies think they were having LSD flashbacks. I like it...


64 posted on 06/09/2007 11:33:49 AM PDT by 04-Bravo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: UlmoLordOfWaters

In Tucson a few years back I saw a pair of F-16s out of D-M in tight formation slide by overhead at fairly low altitude. (I was hiking in the mountains west of town) Subsonic, but very, very fast ‘cause there was no sound until they were well past. There was something eerily beautiful, graceful, yet deadly about them. I think it was the no sound part - up in the Saguaro park there was no background noise at all. I think that made them seem all the more like predators on the hunt. Set off all those long-dormant instincts. ;-)


65 posted on 06/09/2007 4:44:22 PM PDT by CodeMasterPhilzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: oyez

Wow you were Carrier Crew !

Apparently the Carrier is the most vulnerable vessel in the fleet because the enemy obviously need to knock it out first, so the crew need to be better trained in fire/rescue than ordinary sailors, you lads stick you necks out further, is that true ?

Me Uncle Brian drove us to Norfolk for the day when he lived in VA, saw these grey monsters moored in the Harbour. The Royal Navy has carriers (like space craft they were).

What puzzles me is that no other country in the world since the Japs in Second World War has shown any interest in building up a seaborne air force like yours : not Hitlers Germany, not Soviet Union, not China, not Israel, no one.

Anyway the more unpleasant subject of the benders in San Francisco.
Dont bother with all this emailing and writing to the papers - get as many ex military personnel down to their town and make your presence felt ! Fight back !

As always stick up for your country but be peaceful dont use violence unless defending yourself.


66 posted on 06/10/2007 5:11:42 AM PDT by jabbermog (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jabbermog
Wow you were Carrier Crew !

Aircrew, really. We guys ride in the back of the S-2, S-3's, P-3's and the ASW helicopters and monitored the search gear. Best job I ever had.

Americans had a huge respect for Winston Churchill and with his "Iron Curtain" speech helped make the cornerstone of American policy after the war. As it turned out, American policy outlasted that of the Soviet Union. Of course with out you Brits I am not sure that would have happened.

67 posted on 06/10/2007 1:47:24 PM PDT by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lady J USA 1981
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
68 posted on 06/19/2007 7:48:45 AM PDT by davidlachnicht ("IF WE'RE ALL TO BE TARGETS, THEN WE ALL MUST BE SOLDIERS.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

“I thought that San Franciscans loved “macho men.”,

Only if they have no use for women.


69 posted on 06/19/2007 7:50:47 AM PDT by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

“If they put the pinkos in the same area, perhaps the Blue Angels can swoop down and strafe them.”

And then napalm their sorry asses.


70 posted on 06/19/2007 7:52:43 AM PDT by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Raider

“Veterans for Peace, Chapter 69”

Ought to be Veterans for Peace, Section 8.


71 posted on 06/19/2007 7:55:35 AM PDT by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr
Their petition seems to have omitted “global warming” as a reason for the ban.

Not a chance.

“AIR POLLUTION: While we try to stem global climate change and avert its catastrophic consequences, the aircraft spew tons of toxic exhaust during their fly-overs.”

72 posted on 06/19/2007 8:05:44 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson