Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Naming names: The Saddam-al-Qaida connection
World Net Daily ^ | June 6, 2007 | WND

Posted on 06/06/2007 6:14:12 AM PDT by ikez78

WASHINGTON – It has been denied, downplayed, overlooked, forgotten, disregarded and omitted from the public record.

But a thorough review of open-source material demonstrates conclusive and widespread cooperation between former members of Saddam Hussein's Baathist regime and terrorists from the Iraqi al-Qaida network.

Dozens of former Saddam Hussein loyalists captured by U.S.-led coalition forces in Iraq were found to be working with al-Qaida or linked to their operations.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaedainiraq; baathists; iraqalqaeda; prewardocs; saddamandterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
Thanks to WND for posting portions of my updated list of Saddamists caught working for al Qaeda
1 posted on 06/06/2007 6:14:12 AM PDT by ikez78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Huck; nwrep; Cboldt; ServesURight; mc5cents; VOA; ohioWfan; lilylangtree; SeeRushToldU_So; ...

Saddam and terrorism PING


2 posted on 06/06/2007 6:15:24 AM PDT by ikez78 (www.regimeofterror.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikez78; jveritas

bttt


3 posted on 06/06/2007 6:15:29 AM PDT by SolidWood (Save America: Thompson/Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikez78

So what? The problem is that American troops are getting blown up just standing by the roadside. There is no “war” to fight. We have misplayed the military hand. Who cares if we can justify it?


4 posted on 06/06/2007 6:29:30 AM PDT by Vinomori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Excellent article. The most surprising thing in the Iraqi documents is that they showed much stronger relationship between Saddam regime and islamic terrorism including Al Qaeda than anyone ever thought before.


5 posted on 06/06/2007 6:42:27 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vinomori
Hi General Vinomori,
Thanks for your astute military analysis. How long did you spend in the SWA theater to arrive at your conclusions that “we overplayed our military hand”? Or perhaps you draw your military experience from serving in a previous conflict?

Or just should I call you “Ambassador Vinomori” because you work at State Department and are disgruntled that the Bush team neocons ignored your proposals for a diplomatic solution to neutralizing an Iraqi govt that was defying 17 UN resolutions and actively but surreptitiously aiding and abetting sworn enemies of America who had managed to kill 3000 American civilians on US homeland soil in a 3 hour period?

Anyhow. it’s nice hearin’ from ya. I’m sure those soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan welcome the opportunity to give their lives for your right to think and say any damn dumb thing you want to.

6 posted on 06/06/2007 6:43:10 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vinomori
We are fighting the war against Al Qaeda and islamic terrorism in Iraq. Iraq is the center front of this war on terror. The islamic terrorists chose Iraq as the main front to fight the U.S and it is in Iraq where our brave troops are killing and capturing them by the tens of thousands.

God bless our troops.

7 posted on 06/06/2007 6:44:49 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Dick Cheney has been adamant about the intelligence backing the links. Also James Woolsey (former Clinton-ear CIA director)


8 posted on 06/06/2007 6:45:51 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Excellent post FRiend. Some people inability to see and comprehend simple facts is very shocking, and those people claim to be on our side.
9 posted on 06/06/2007 6:46:53 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

lol


10 posted on 06/06/2007 6:47:52 AM PDT by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ikez78

World Nut Daily beating a dead horse with imaginary links again I see. Nothing new. Funny though. If everything was going peachy in Iraq, why is Crazy Joe still trying to make justification for going to Iraq in the first place?


11 posted on 06/06/2007 6:49:34 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Correct.


12 posted on 06/06/2007 6:49:36 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vinomori

John, John McCain—Is that you???


13 posted on 06/06/2007 6:52:56 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vinomori

Well I don’t think a guy sitting at home in the U.S. is hurting the troops and Generals in Iraq trying to accomplish things and moving forward.

It’s not possible to examine history anymore unless a war is over?


14 posted on 06/06/2007 6:57:55 AM PDT by ikez78 (www.regimeofterror.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: billbears

beating a dead horse?

Ok...


15 posted on 06/06/2007 7:01:28 AM PDT by ikez78 (www.regimeofterror.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Maybe publicizing the links is being done to answer nutty people are proposing we withdraw and surrender because there was not justification for going into Iraq in first place ... ? That Iraq had nothing to do with the war on terror and the US invasion was about oil and settling old grudges by George Bush against an elected leader (100% of the popular vote!) who tried to kill his “poppy” aka a former US President?

BTW, what is your definition of “peachy” conditions in Iraq? The pre-war conditions? The conditions where Saddam and his psychopath thug sons were picking Iraqi citizens off the streets and out of their villages in droves for the sheer joy of torture? The situation where the USAF/USN were flying air sorties (and being shot at) 24/7 to try and enforce 17 UN resolutions and economic sanctions the libs decried as killing Iraqi children? The situation where Saddam was selling Iraq’s oil to pay bribes to the UN officials to keep up a charade of concern about ongoing WMD research and human rights violations of genocidal proportion? The situation where some of that oil money was going into the hands of terrorist to train jihadis to blow up American aircraft. ships embassies and cities?

Those peachy conditions?

16 posted on 06/06/2007 7:01:30 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vinomori
MOVE to Venezuela! Your political opinion would fit in perfectly there!

LLS

17 posted on 06/06/2007 7:01:55 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
The situation where the USAF/USN were flying air sorties (and being shot at) 24/7 to try and enforce 17 UN resolutions

And exactly where is it in the Constitution it is our business to enforce resolutions of a world government. They want their resolutions enforced, let them do it.

18 posted on 06/06/2007 7:06:38 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; ikez78
Joseph,

Ya know, just plain old common sense tells you that there was a connection simply by how fast the Sunnis and Baathist officials aligned themselves with Abu Musab al Zarqawi to fight the “occupation.”

And it's already known that Abu Musab al Zarqawi came to Iraq after Afghanistan fell. and that they assinated US diplomat Foley in Jordan while it was planned from Iraq and they planned the foiled chemical attack in Jordan which was to strike both Jordan and American intersts. All this before the start of the Iraq war.

Have I ever shown you this link? It's the actual transcript of the confession from Jordan TV from al Zarqawi's men about the planned chemical attack on Jordan. They clearly establish that al-Qaeda was in Iraq and planning and carrying out attacks against US interests from Iraqi soil since before the start of the Iraq War.

Tuesday, April 27, 2004

[Full text of confession]Al Qaeda Plans Terrorist Attack in Chemical Weapons against Jordan

19 posted on 06/06/2007 7:09:07 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vinomori
So what? The problem is that American troops are getting blown up just standing by the roadside. There is no “war” to fight. We have misplayed the military hand. Who cares if we can justify it?

So, I'm guessing that you are a pro-Afghanistan, anti-Iraq kinda guy, right? Probably a big Ron Paul supporter?
20 posted on 06/06/2007 7:14:26 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (The United States of America is the only country strong enough to go it alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson