Nope. Of course this is 2007, and Libby was questioned back in 2003-2004. And it would help if you rephrased the question to more closely resemble this case, instead of being an open-ended one. You have to ask where I learned about a certain person.
And I won't be giving different versions of what I may have known to different people. The truth is a story easy to stick to, but it's hard to keep your lies straight. They already had a trial to determine whether it was a memory lapse or perjury.
and a DC jury that apparently had at least one member with a conflict of interest so huge that it’s amazing Libby’s attorney’s didn’t object to..
If the jury was so biased, then why was he acquitted on one of the charges? Members of the jury said they were sympathetic to Libby, but just couldn't believe that it was simply a memory lapse.
Another idiot who defends this outrage...
I believe you got my point, that Libby was questioned quite some time after the conversations happened. Far enough that it is plausable IMO to be unclear or mis-stated but not necessarily intentionally misrepresented.
One of the jurors came on television shortly after the verdict and it was found that he had....media ties IIRC. I won’t have a chance to research the name as I’m going to work soon, but it was heavily noted here that particular juror seemed inappropriate to a case involving media figures. That’s what I was referring to, if I get a chance I’ll try to research the old Libby threads for a name. Perhaps somebody else will remember it.