Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The governor's dueling promises
San Diego Union Tribune ^ | June 1, 2007 | By Tom McClintock

Posted on 06/03/2007 12:09:51 AM PDT by BigFinn

Gov. Schwarzenegger has staked his administration upon two signature issues: his international leadership to reduce “greenhouse gases” and his promise to construct new highways, dams, levees, aqueducts and other public works.

Last month “The Green Governor” toured the globe to tout his “greenhouse gas” bill, AB 32, that requires a 25 percent reduction in carbon dioxide by 2020 – making it the most restrictive emissions law in the country. Recently, the governor toured California to tout his public works renaissance that requires $40 billion in taxpayer-financed bonds – making it the biggest borrowing binge in the country.

Individually, these two media events have played to rave reviews. But combined, they form a picture of breathtaking mendacity. The governor's crusade against “greenhouse gases” is, in fact, the single greatest impediment to the era of public works that he has promised, and the crusade for public works construction is the biggest impediment to reducing “greenhouse gases” that he has promised.

To understand the dilemma requires a quick recap of the chemistry lecture that Gov. Schwarzenegger apparently missed. Highways, dams, levees and aqueducts require prodigious amounts of concrete, the central ingredient of which is cement. Cement is manufactured by superheating limestone to produce a compound called “clinker,” which is about two-thirds of the rock's original weight. The missing third of that weight is carbon dioxide. Lots of CO. In fact, cement production is the third biggest contributor of “greenhouse gases” in all human activity, ranking only behind internal combustion and deforestation.

(Excerpt) Read more at signonsandiego.com ...


TOPICS: Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: globalwarming; mcclintock
Attorney General Jerry Brown used AB 32 to sue San Bernardino County and threaten San Joaquin County on the grounds that their transportation plans fail to explain how they plan to construct or operate highways without increasing CO emissions. Get those bikes ready, you're going to need them soon.
1 posted on 06/03/2007 12:09:53 AM PDT by BigFinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BigFinn

All each county needs to do is to write a plan:

Ground rules for (this county) plan is that all other counties will reduce C02 emissions enough that (this county) will be able to purchase offsets at the minimal cost of 1 dollar ber 100,000 tons of carbon.

On the other hand the facts are:
1. Global warming would be a good thing.
2. Global warming , to the extent that it exists, is caused by the Sun.
3. The earth already acts as a black body, and so carbon emissions can not cause heating.


2 posted on 06/03/2007 12:15:02 AM PDT by donmeaker (You may not be interested in War but War is interested in you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigFinn

If Tom McClintock were an even halfway decent candidate, we wouldn’t be here right now.


3 posted on 06/03/2007 1:12:15 AM PDT by FremontLives (The eagle never lost so much time as when he submitted to learn from the crow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigFinn
Its kind of funny... you can't have public works without creating a lot CO2 and by the way the Left isn't interested in the works of Man. Its far more interested in the works of Nature. Our opponents by definition and policy, are misanthropes. They care not one whit for improving the quality of human life.

Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

4 posted on 06/03/2007 3:39:06 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

What would be the purpose of all those new roads and bridges? The worlds most expensive bike paths? Frog migration routes? (see Davis tunnel). At some point someone MIGHT want to actually use those things to travel on and guess what? More CO2.....


5 posted on 06/03/2007 3:55:26 AM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

It’s actualy worse than just travel. Water vapor is the most potent greenhouse gas of all, and he proposes new dams and aqueducts, which will increase water vapor, and thus, greenhouse gas. They have not yet figured out that the recent Supreme Court case saying anything that is put into the air is a pollutant under the Clean Air Act means the end of California agriculture, as well as green lawns.


6 posted on 06/03/2007 9:34:33 AM PDT by Cincinnatus.45-70 (Patriotism to DemocRats is like sunlight to Dracula.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FremontLives
If Tom McClintock were an even halfway decent candidate, we wouldn’t be here right now.

Hogwash! The only reason McC lost is because the LIBERAL leaders in the California Republican Party starved him of campaign cash and our LIBERAL governor stabbed him in the back a week before the election.

7 posted on 06/03/2007 3:59:27 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson