Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrEdd
"They considered unprotected relations to be 'pure'."

Sodomy is not "relations" and it is in no way "pure." It's an act of violence that does bodily harm.

I favor Thomas Jefferson's approach--those who commit sodomy should be castrated.
19 posted on 05/31/2007 10:50:03 AM PDT by Antoninus (P!ss off an environmentalist wacko . . . have more kids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Antoninus

You said, in part: “They considered unprotected relations to be ‘pure’.”
***

They must have a different definition of “pure” than I do. I wonder if they take a look at their “members” after they remove them from their partners’ bottoms... I suspect THAT doesn’t look too pure... under any definition....


35 posted on 05/31/2007 12:29:41 PM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson