[Recovering Ex-hippie]

Oh..that was so intellectual and so clever.
Did you ever get out of grade school? ...I bet you made that response up all by yourself, didn’t you.

Let me make my response just a little simpler.

If there is a child with a severe physical disability and a single or two gay people who have been screened by the agency want to care for the child so it is not institutionalzied because there is no heterosexual couple available...let me guess...YOU would object.

[Alouette]

If there is a child with a severe physical disability

Gays don't want special needs children. They want to be first in line for the blond blue-eyed trophy babies.

[Antoninus]

If there is a child with a severe physical disability and a single or two gay people who have been screened by the agency want to care for the child so it is not institutionalzied because there is no heterosexual couple available...let me guess...YOU would object.

You argue exactly like a lib--create a worst-case scenario argument and dare someone to be against it. Well, here's a similar argument for you:

Let's suppose that 50% of homosexual adoptions turned into situations where the kids were sexually abused. In the other 50%, the kids were treated well. Would you be willing to support homo-adoptions then?

This is bull-crap. No kid should EVER be put into the home of two individuals with a serious mental illness. I don't care what the APA says--most of these poor children are going to be seriously screwed up. God help our nation for allowing it and our bishops for letting it go unchallenged.

And yes, Abp. Niederauer is looking like an abominable appointment--just another Lavendar-mafia-apparatchik.