Posted on 05/21/2007 10:52:51 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
PEARL HARBOR (NNS) -- The Navy is disappointed with EarthJustice’s decision to pursue litigation against critical training activities in Hawaiian waters, the deputy commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet said.
“These fleet training activities are essential to the Navy’s ability to ensure our nation’s armed forces are fully combat ready and adequately trained according to established, time-tested standards,” said Rear Adm. John M. Bird.
The suit, filed May 16 by EarthJustice on behalf of five non-government organizations, asks the court to prohibit naval sonar exercises near Hawaii, saying that sonar can have a negative impact on marine mammals.
But such exercises have already taken place in Hawaiian waters with no problems.
“Since January the Navy has conducted two undersea warfare exercises, incorporating mid-frequency active sonar, with no issues,” said Capt. Scott Gureck, Pacific Fleet public affairs officer. “We take steps to identify and avoid marine mammals during training, and we are complying with all laws that protect marine mammals throughout the Hawaiian Islands—the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act.”
As part of the process of protecting marine mammals that inhabit Hawaii’s waters, the Navy coordinated closely with the National Marine Fisheries Service to identify the mitigation measures in place during these exercises, Gureck noted.
The Navy complies with all applicable statutes, regulations and executive orders and strives to protect the environment, prevent pollution and protect natural, historic and cultural resources. Navy policy requires that major fleet exercises be reviewed for environmental compliance and for potential effect on marine mammals and other marine life.
The Navy has developed and implemented procedures based on the best available science throughout the fleet that are designed to help individual ship commanders maintain readiness and protect the environment during routine training and exercises by identifying and employing appropriate protective measures for sensitive marine resources. These measures provide environmental situational awareness as well as specific operating procedures based on place, date and type of training event.
“As a Navy, we live on and in the sea,” Bird said. “We take our responsibility for protecting the oceans and marine life very seriously and have committed resources and a significant amount of effort to that end. We are also committed to provide safe, realistic, and meaningful training.”
For more information, visit www.whalesandsonar.navy.mil
For more news from Pacific Fleet, visit www.news.navy.mil/local/cpf
Our government is FAR too tolerant of these extremist nutjob organizations. I agree, they should be counter-sued for all costs to the Navy. Then these scumbags would think twice about trying to make a name for themselves on the back of our military.
Here in Utah, the group that sued and shut down the Legacy Highway is hating life. There was a law passed a couple of years ago that dictates when you put forth a lawsuit and lose, YOU are automatically liable for all costs associated with downtime that your lawsuit caused. Since the contract was already awarded, the contractor had already committed resources to starting the job, and the suing organization timed their lawsuit to maximize the cost to the contractor and govt. (that is, taxpayer), it cost over $100,000/month that the job wasn’t being done. The highway is being built now after the greenies backed-down at the prospect of having to pay million$ for their frivolous lawsuit. They’re all pissed and I think it’s great!
If we can sue these Nazi anti-Americans I will donate.
Let me know please!
If only. These are well funded (Soros & the like), highly sophisticated operations to destroy the United States piecemeal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.