Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nyscof

Checking back on the source, the CDC finds that the 2 to 5 year olds had slightly increased cavities. From the story Lawyer Paul Beeber, President, New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation says, “Recent news reports claiming fluoride-free bottled water caused the cavity increase trends in toddlers are implausible because rising fluorosis rates clearly indicate that children are over-fluoridated, not under-fluoridated.”
(translation)[we don’t think the lack of flouride in bottled water is the cause since more cities are putting flouride in city drinking water.] ??????


10 posted on 05/19/2007 2:42:50 PM PDT by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kent1957

Fluoridated water makes no difference in tooth decay rates; but income does. The study that found an increase in toddlers decay rates actually shows that low-income toddlers decay rates have spiked upwards and non-poor toddlers decay rates remained stable. In fact, non-poor 3 and 4 year old’s decay actually improved. Obviously, low-income toddlers are less likely to drink bottled water than non-poor toddlers.

It is actually more scientifically plausible to conclude that avoiding fluoridated water reduces tooth decay, based on the information provided in this study.


22 posted on 05/20/2007 4:06:12 AM PDT by nyscof (Dentists are also fluoride misinformed; always get another opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson